Author
Listed:
- Tuğba ÇİÇEK
(Düzce Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü)
- Mehmet Selami YILDIZ
(Düzce Üniversitesi İşletme Fakültesi, İşletme Bölümü)
- Ä°smail DURAK
(Düzce Üniversitesi İşletme Fakültesi, İşletme Bölümü, Sayısal Yöntemler ABD)
Abstract
To present the right product at the right place, time, in the right way and at the lowest possible cost, in a way to achieve customer satisfaction; it is critical for businesses to take sustainability as the main criterion when carrying out these operations. The selection of the most appropriate supplier within a sustainable supply chain is the problem of this research. For this purpose, AHP, TOPSIS and ELECTRE methods, which are multi-criteria decisionmaking techniques, have been applied on a firm. The economic, social and environmental criteria, which are the criteria of sustainability, were determined as the main criteria. In addition to these 3 main criteria, 12 sub-criteria were included in the study. The AHP method was used to determine the significance of the main criteria and subcriteria, while the TOPSIS and ELECTRE methods was used to select the most appropriate supplier. The main criteria according to their importance at the end of the study; while they are listed as economic, environmental and social criteria respectively; the most important sub-criteria are quality, price, delivery performance and environmental management system respectively. “Supplier A†has been selected as the supplier with the highest score among the current suppliers of the company.
Suggested Citation
Tuğba ÇİÇEK & Mehmet Selami YILDIZ & İsmail DURAK, 2020.
"The Selection Of The Most Suitable Supplier In Sustainable Supply Chain With Ahp, Topsis And Electre Methods,"
Eurasian Eononometrics, Statistics and Emprical Economics Journal, Eurasian Academy Of Sciences, vol. 16(16), pages 1-18, February.
Handle:
RePEc:eas:econst:v:16:y:2020:i:16:p:1-18
DOI: 10.17740/eas.stat.2020�V16�01
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eas:econst:v:16:y:2020:i:16:p:1-18. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kutluk Kagan Sumer (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.eurasianacademy.org/index.php/econstat .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.