IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eas/econst/v15y2020i15p69-81.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparison Of Turkish Foreign Trade Structure And Competitiveness Power With Oecd Countries

Author

Listed:
  • Semin PAKSOY

    (Çukurova Üniversitesi)

Abstract

In today's global economic conditions, the way for the countries to increase their competitiveness and effectiveness depends on being able to export the products they produce as well as being productive. There is a widespread belief that the country's export power contributes significantly to sustainable economic growth. Therefore, countries are making great efforts to increase their international trade and market shares. The export revenues obtained will not only contribute to economic growth, but will also enable new investments in the country to meet the needs of infrastructure, health, education and to ensure social welfare. In this study, it is aimed to investigate the Turkey's foreign trade structure and competitiveness power comparing with the OECD countries during the period 2000 - 2009 by employing the TOPSIS method. In the analysis, nine foreign trade competition indexes are used to compare 31 OECD countries with data integrity. Selected variables or indices are widely used in cross country comparison. TOPSIS method, one of the multi-criteria decision making techniques, is used for comparison. Analysis showed that Turkey's competitiveness in foreign trade cannot show a remarkable development since 2000, but it is seen that there has been a small leap in 2009. In general, it is observed that the foreign trade balance could not be established in the all years within the period 2000-2009. Turkey has still required the important and constructive interferences in the line with export-led growth model.

Suggested Citation

  • Semin PAKSOY, 2020. "Comparison Of Turkish Foreign Trade Structure And Competitiveness Power With Oecd Countries," Eurasian Eononometrics, Statistics and Emprical Economics Journal, Eurasian Academy Of Sciences, vol. 15(15), pages 69-81, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:eas:econst:v:15:y:2020:i:15:p:69-81
    DOI: 10.17740/eas.stat.2020-V15-05
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://eurasianacademy.org/index.php/econstat/article/view/1000
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17740/eas.stat.2020-V15-05?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eas:econst:v:15:y:2020:i:15:p:69-81. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kutluk Kagan Sumer (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.eurasianacademy.org/index.php/econstat .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.