Author
Listed:
- Halim Kazan
(Istanbul University)
- Engin Karaman
(Istanbul University)
Abstract
Turkey held various examinations with different names under the name of system of transition to secondary education in the last 30 years. However, each examination method was found inadequate and Turkish education system could not reach the desired success in PISA examination in which student levels of countries that are members of OECD are assessed. For this reason, it was embarked on new quests. TEOG examination was prepared according to semester curriculum, unlike antecedents which are consisted of single day and sessions. Thus, subjective error was minimized in the assessment by reducing the negative effect of the anxiety level factor in assessment of the student. Also, influence degree of school success points was increased. Hence, creation of a process-oriented education model was targeted not result-oriented. In this study; it was started to be searched whether TEOG examination is different from Institutions' Examination, LGS, OKS, SBS, OGES examinations used in transition to the secondary education in the previous years or not. The essential point in the research is to present success performances of schools after it was explained the PISA examination. In last section, it was examined feature of Decision-Making and Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Technique. In implementation phase Successes of 23 secondary schools operating at education-training in Ceylanpınar county which was selected as the pilot region in Şanlıurfa were examined in order to show difference of TEOG examination from the other examinations. 6 courses taught in pilot schools within the scope of TEOG central examination were selected. Success averages of courses selected were weighted and pointed with TOPSIS method which is Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Technique (MCDM). Points were mixed and a ranking was formed. Significant differences were found between the ranking obtained as a result of the study and ranking published by Ministry of National Education. While there is no change in lower and upper ranks in the both rankings, great ranking differences were found in mid-ranks.
Suggested Citation
Halim Kazan & Engin Karaman, 2017.
"Assessment of TEOG Examination Success: Topsis Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Method Practice,"
Eurasian Business & Economics Journal, Eurasian Academy Of Sciences, vol. 8(8), pages 165-179, February.
Handle:
RePEc:eas:buseco:v:8:y:2017:i:8:p:165-179
DOI: 10.17740/eas.econ.2017.V8-09
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eas:buseco:v:8:y:2017:i:8:p:165-179. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kutluk Kagan Sumer (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.eurasianacademy.org/index.php/busecon .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.