IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eas/buseco/v5y2016i5p53-63.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Performance Evaluation of Turkish Commercial Banks Using AHP and TOPSIS

Author

Listed:
  • Ä°lyas Akhisar

    (Kırklareli Üniversitesi)

  • K. Batu Tunay

    (Marmara Ãœniversitesi)

Abstract

Measuring performance and determining the key factors of performance have been an important research topic in different sector in recent years. The main goal of this study is to evaluate the performance ranks of the Commercial banks in Turkey due to the fact that performances of Commercial banks are important at the stage of economic growth. In this research, the Commercial banks in Turkey ranked by TOPSIS method using weights of capital ratios obtained from AHP. The performance ranks of Commercial banks sorted according to their TOPSIS scores for the period 2009-2013. In this study, capital ratios of Turkish Commercial banks are placed in a hierarchical decision structure to establish pair-wise comparisons between the model parameters which are based on the subjective judgment of a group of experts. In order to find the performance order of the Commercial banks in Turkey according to financial ratios, calculated criteria and sub-criteria weights for each banks by using AHP to use in TOPSIS method. Performance scores of Commercial the banks obtained by TOPSIS method related with banks? financial ratios of AHP weights. Consequently, the performances and also the sector share of the commercial banks weren't changed for analyzed period.

Suggested Citation

  • Ä°lyas Akhisar & K. Batu Tunay, 2016. "Performance Evaluation of Turkish Commercial Banks Using AHP and TOPSIS," Eurasian Business & Economics Journal, Eurasian Academy Of Sciences, vol. 5(5), pages 53-63, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:eas:buseco:v:5:y:2016:i:5:p:53-63
    DOI: 10.17740/eas.econ.2016.V5-05
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://eurasianacademy.org/index.php/busecon/article/view/699
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17740/eas.econ.2016.V5-05?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eas:buseco:v:5:y:2016:i:5:p:53-63. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kutluk Kagan Sumer (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.eurasianacademy.org/index.php/busecon .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.