Author
Listed:
- Özlem KARATAŞ
(Sakarya Ãœniversitesi)
- Tijen ÖVER ÖZÇELİK
(Sakarya Ãœniversitesi)
Abstract
In recent years, consumers have tended to develop environmentally friendly approaches to nature. Businesses also carry out production with an environmentally friendly approach and reflect this understanding in all production processes. Choosing the right green supplier is vital in enterprises' ecologically friendly production. Businesses can have more than one green supplier in today's market. This situation brings up supplier selection/decision-making problems for firms, and these problems contain many uncertainties. It becomes even more critical that the decision-makers make their decisions objectively and accurately, especially if the number of criteria and alternatives is high. Multi-criteria decision-making methods make it possible to evaluate with a scientific and systematic approach in case of multiple alternatives and criteria. Due to this feature, it is widely used in green supplier selection problems. In this study, the green supplier selection problem of a business operating in the electricity sector was investigated. The primary purpose of the study is to provide the optimum green supplier selection for the enterprise. First of all, the opinions of three experts in the enterprise were taken and obtained from the literature; compliance quality, green product design, green purchasing, and green production criteria have created the most suitable criteria for the study. EDAS and VIKOR methods, which are multi-criteria decision-making methods, are handled separately, and the optimum green supplier is selected for the enterprise. The consistency of the results obtained with the RoHS analysis applied in the enterprise is examined. As a result of the research, the same green supplier ranking was obtained with the RoHS analysis, VIKOR, and EDAS methods.
Suggested Citation
Özlem KARATAŞ & Tijen ÖVER ÖZÇELİK, 2022.
"Green Supplier Selection With Edas And Vikor Methods In The Electricity Sector,"
Eurasian Business & Economics Journal, Eurasian Academy Of Sciences, vol. 30(30), pages 99-114, February.
Handle:
RePEc:eas:buseco:v:30:y:2022:i:30:p:99-114
DOI: 10.17740/eas.econ.2022-V30-07
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eas:buseco:v:30:y:2022:i:30:p:99-114. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kutluk Kagan Sumer (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.eurasianacademy.org/index.php/busecon .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.