Author
Abstract
Organizational economics that made a description of how it should be for the science of economics has considered the economy as a wholly institutionalized process, departed from established economics and virtually proved that a new economics can be possible. It tries to eliminate the dilemmas of established economics? excessive abstract methods by including specifically the concept of organization widely in economic analyses and uses the organizational approaches as a lever for this purpose. In this study, the conceptualization process of the institution phenomenon, which plays a role in strengthening the consistency in the theoretical analysis of economics, is discussed. It is emphasized how to pass from the abstract institution definition to the concrete reality and the sources of the objective parameters representing the institutions are examined. The results are that economic theories and policies should be scrutinized in terms of institutions and the indicators representing them, and the approach of developing static theoretical approaches for different societies, cultures, geographies and different times should be abandoned. In this context, institutions should be added to the study universe of economics as an inseparable element, and they should be dynamically examined continuously with their historical and evolutionary processes.The concretization of institutions and institutional structure and which indicators should be developed and monitored for this should be taken into the theoretical focus of economics.
Suggested Citation
Yahya Can DURA, 2020.
"A Methodological Analysis On The Conceptualization Of Institutions In The Discipline Of Economics,"
Eurasian Business & Economics Journal, Eurasian Academy Of Sciences, vol. 24(24), pages 1-12, February.
Handle:
RePEc:eas:buseco:v:24:y:2020:i:24:p:1-12
DOI: 10.17740/eas.econ.2020.V24-01
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eas:buseco:v:24:y:2020:i:24:p:1-12. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kutluk Kagan Sumer (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://busecon.eurasianacademy.org/eng/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.