IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eas/buseco/v21y2020i21p41-53.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Does The Employees? Work Engagement Attitudes Affect Presenteeism?

Author

Listed:
  • AyÅŸe Gökçen KAPUSUZ

Abstract

The aim of this study is to examine the relationship between work engagement attitudes and presenteeism. Data were collected from 151 hotel managers operating in Antalya/Turkey and used for statistical analyses. Convenience sampling method and survey technique were used in data collection process. The validity and reliability criterias of work engagement scale with three dimensions named as physical, cognitive, emotional engagement and standford presenteeism scale were obtained. According to the results of descriptive statistics which were done by expecting the significant relationship between work engagement and presenteeism, participants graded the highest scores on physical, cognitive and emotional engagement and presenteeism respectively. However, based on the correlation analysis results there is a statistically insignificant relationship between the dimensions of work engagement and presenteeism (p>0,05). According to this, even though hotel managers are work-engaged individuals, it is seen that this is not reflected in presenteeism. Theoretical and practical aspects of this study were also discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • AyÅŸe Gökçen KAPUSUZ, 2020. "Does The Employees? Work Engagement Attitudes Affect Presenteeism?," Eurasian Business & Economics Journal, Eurasian Academy Of Sciences, vol. 21(21), pages 41-53, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:eas:buseco:v:21:y:2020:i:21:p:41-53
    DOI: 10.17740/eas.econ.2020.V21-04
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://eurasianacademy.org/index.php/busecon/article/view/842
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17740/eas.econ.2020.V21-04?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eas:buseco:v:21:y:2020:i:21:p:41-53. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kutluk Kagan Sumer (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.eurasianacademy.org/index.php/busecon .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.