IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eas/buseco/v11y2017i11p55-70.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparison of Participating And Traditional Banks in Terms of Risk Management in Turkey: Quantile Var Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Hilal GüloÄŸlu

    (Istanbul University)

  • Ercan SarıdoÄŸan

    (ercan.saridogan@istanbul.edu.tr)

  • Bülent GüloÄŸlu

    (Istanbul Technical University)

Abstract

This study aims to compare what is named as participating banks, Islamic banks or banks without interest with the traditional banks in terms of risk management. This comparison is based on an econometric analysis which analyzes sensitivity of the two systems to financial shocks. For this purpose the quantile VAR approach which has been recently developed by White et al.(2016) has been employed. First tail codependende hypothesis between national and international financial markets and Akbank, Garanti Bankası, İş Bank, Yapı ve Kredi Bankası and Albarakatürk, which is the sole participating bank listed in Borsa Istanbul 100 index, has been tested. Then dynamic value at risks are estimated for those banks. Finally the impact of a financial shock in Islamic, national and international financial markets on those banks? long run risk are separately analyzed using impulse response functions obtained from quantile VAR. In this study the national stock market is represented by BIST100 index, the international financial market is represented by S&P500 index and the Islamic financial market is represented by S&P500 index. The result show that Islamic banks are less affected by financial shocks than traditional financial markets.

Suggested Citation

  • Hilal GüloÄŸlu & Ercan SarıdoÄŸan & Bülent GüloÄŸlu, 2017. "Comparison of Participating And Traditional Banks in Terms of Risk Management in Turkey: Quantile Var Approach," Eurasian Business & Economics Journal, Eurasian Academy Of Sciences, vol. 11(11), pages 55-70, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:eas:buseco:v:11:y:2017:i:11:p:55-70
    DOI: 10.17740/eas.econ.2017-V11-04
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://eurasianacademy.org/index.php/busecon/article/view/744
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17740/eas.econ.2017-V11-04?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eas:buseco:v:11:y:2017:i:11:p:55-70. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kutluk Kagan Sumer (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://busecon.eurasianacademy.org/eng/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.