Author
Listed:
- Gökhan Aydoğan
(Ankara University)
Abstract
Within the conventional distinction of financial markets as money market and capital market, along with the difference of institutions, maturity, and resource costs between these markets, one of the criteria used for making this distinction is “the difference of traded instruments†. At this point, whereas the main instruments of money markets are cash, foreign currency, gold and commerical paper (promissory note, bill of exchange, cheque), “capital market instruments†emerge as the parent concept of securities and other capital market instruments. Gaining importance of capital markets depends on whether confidence, which is difficult to gain but easy to lose in this market, can be gained by the market actors that supply funds to and demand funds from the market. This situation has also been considered in the implementation of regulations concerning the capital market instruments. Similarly, relavant duties and authorities of the Capital Markets Board of Turkey which is the supervisory and regulatory authority of the capital markets are to ensure functioning and development of capital markets in a secure, transparent, efficient, stable, fair and competitive environment and to protect the rights and interests of investors. In this context, general framework of relevant regulations and the evaluation of financial impacts of desired legal structure is essential. In this study, it is aimed, with an interdisciplinary perspective, to make a remark within the scope of the legal framework of capital market instruments, the terms “issuer†and “public offerers†and legal and financial impacts of issue of these instruments, concerning the Capital Market Law numbered 6362 and the new Turkish Commercial Law numbered 6102 and the communiqués of the Capital Markets Board of Turkey.
Suggested Citation
Gökhan Aydoğan, 2016.
"“Capital Market Instruments†In Consideration With New Regulations,"
Eurasian Business & Economics Journal, Eurasian Academy Of Sciences, vol. 2(02), pages 177-192, February.
Handle:
RePEc:eas:buseco:v:02:y:2016:i:02:p:177-192
DOI: 10.17740/eas.econ.2016-MSEMP-62
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eas:buseco:v:02:y:2016:i:02:p:177-192. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kutluk Kagan Sumer (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://busecon.eurasianacademy.org/eng/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.