Author
Abstract
While one party of academia-industry collaboration is composed of business entities, the other party is composed of academicians. Unless sufficient level of motivation is reached, academicians do not perform well and be successful within this collaboration. In this paper, effective factors in motivating academicians for industry collaboration are analyzed. For this purpose, in-depth interviews are conducted which is one of the techniques in Qualitative Research. The data collected form these in-depth interviews are analyzed in terms of Herzberg's Two-Factor Theory which is one of the content theories and the results are classified. Thus, motivation and hygiene factors that are effective in motivating academicians for industry collaboration are identified. Less course load and management’s support in terms of bureaucracy and administrative functions came to the front as prominent factors. The emerged motivation factors can be listed as being able to observe theoretical academic knowledge put into practice, gain recognition and access social circles, find an opportunity to update academic knowledge, transfer the knowledge gained from business life to students by supplementing classes, ensure grant and employment opportunities to students, discharge the responsibility to society, and have access to technical and social means that are not ensured by universities. For some academicians, while the facts of inclusion of academia-industry collaboration within academic promotion criteria and matter of financial gain act as a hygiene factor, for others they act as a motivation factor. In conclusion, taking aforementioned factorsinto account, works and studies to be performed in order to ease and develop industry collaboration are determined and it is suggested to conduct a quantitative research and develop a scale to detect the significance of these factors.
Suggested Citation
Cihan Çiflikli Kaya & Murat Yalçıntaş, 2016.
"Factors Motivating Academicians for Industry Collaboration- A Qualitative Research,"
Eurasian Business & Economics Journal, Eurasian Academy Of Sciences, vol. 1(01), pages 324-331, February.
Handle:
RePEc:eas:buseco:v:01:y:2016:i:01:p:324-331
DOI: 10.17740/eas.econ.2016-MSEMP-30
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eas:buseco:v:01:y:2016:i:01:p:324-331. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kutluk Kagan Sumer (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://busecon.eurasianacademy.org/eng/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.