Author
Abstract
The importance of intellectual capital has become more evident with the increasing competition in industries and the study on employees providing maximum value to their parent organization has become a trending topic for organizations research. The necessity of preserving the employee base obligates the organization to devise a system which is appropriate for the organization, the groups/departments and employees by utilizing human resources management functions. In this context, the evaluation of the human resources management functions by the employees gain importance, since they are what ensure the organizational synergy and the continuity of the high motivation – high performance relationship by merging the high-performer employees. The preconditions for the human resources functions to operate satisfactorily are closely coupled with the overall hierarchy of the organization and its decision makers which decide on the strategy formulation. With regards to this, it is safe to say that the level and the dimensions of institutionalization in an organization is amongst the essential factors effecting the development and application of effective human resources functions. This research provides an insight on relationships between the level of institutionalization of an organization and the evaluations of human resources functions within that organization. With regards to the research findings spanning a sample set of 156 employees from 38 organizations, professionalism, cultural power and consistency from an institutionalization point of view, have positive influences on effectiveness evaluation of human resources functions. Distinguished institutionalization dimensions have been identified for every human resources management function.
Suggested Citation
Işık Çiçek & Emine Hacıkura, 2016.
"An Antecedent of Evaluation For Human Resource Functions: Institutonalization,"
Eurasian Business & Economics Journal, Eurasian Academy Of Sciences, vol. 1(01), pages 131-150, February.
Handle:
RePEc:eas:buseco:v:01:y:2016:i:01:p:131-150
DOI: 10.17740/eas.econ.2016-MSEMP-14
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eas:buseco:v:01:y:2016:i:01:p:131-150. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kutluk Kagan Sumer (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://busecon.eurasianacademy.org/eng/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.