IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/dug/journl/y2015i2p7-19.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparative analysis multiple criteria for the choice of a common transport system in Rabat (Morocco)

Author

Listed:
  • Badreddine EL GOUMI

    (University Sidi Mohamed Ben Abdellah)

  • Mohammed El KHOMSSI

    (University Sidi Mohamed Ben Abdellah)

  • Ghizlane CHAIBI

    (University Sidi Mohamed Ben Abdellah)

Abstract

The choice of a transport system is a complex and difficult job. Different systems may seem to offer equivalent services to users while often lack the information necessary to better distinguish the differences between a particular systems. We present a comparative analysis of public transport systems in Rabat-Sale to better guide the selection of communities, in the context of promoting urban transport meeting the challenges of sustainable development. We analyzed, presented the criteria and characteristics of each system, proposed and discussed a multi-criteria method to the weighted sum to propose the best adapted system with knowledge and clarity. We close this work with the results showing the fact that the tram has a special place in relation to the bus in the majority of scenarios.

Suggested Citation

  • Badreddine EL GOUMI & Mohammed El KHOMSSI & Ghizlane CHAIBI, 2015. "Comparative analysis multiple criteria for the choice of a common transport system in Rabat (Morocco)," EuroEconomica, Danubius University of Galati, issue 2(34), pages 7-19, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:dug:journl:y:2015:i:2:p:7-19
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://journals.univ-danubius.ro/index.php/euroeconomica/article/view/2871
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sarbast Moslem & Tiziana Campisi & Agnieszka Szmelter-Jarosz & Szabolcs Duleba & Kh Md Nahiduzzaman & Giovanni Tesoriere, 2020. "Best–Worst Method for Modelling Mobility Choice after COVID-19: Evidence from Italy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-19, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dug:journl:y:2015:i:2:p:7-19. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Florian Nuta (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fedanro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.