IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/dse/indecr/v39y2004i1p203-237.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Inter-State Perspective on Manufacturing Productivity in India: 1980-81 to 2000-01

Author

Listed:
  • Pushpa Trivedi

    (Indian Institute of Technology %G –%@ Bombay, Powai, Mumbai-400 076, India)

Abstract

Industrial performance of various states needs to be viewed in totality, i.e, with respect to growth of output, employment and productivity. Moreover, productivity levels are as important as productivity growth trends, as both are pertinent in the convergence process. This study is an attempt to interpret inter-state differences in productivity movements in organized manufacturing sector, in a larger perspective of employment and output trends. The time-span of the study is 1980-81 to 2000-01 and it encompasses 10 major states of India. The study empirically confirms the existence of inter-state differences in productivity levels and growth rates. It points out that states, such as, Bihar and West Bengal are diverging away from rather than converging to the growth rates of output of organized manufacturing sector at the national level. Though productivity growth in Bihar appears to be high, it has been mainly achieved by joblessness. Madhya Pradesh and Rajasthan, which have been considered as BIMARU states, seem to be good performers from a wider perspective and show the promise to get themselves rid of their economically backward status.

Suggested Citation

  • Pushpa Trivedi, 2004. "An Inter-State Perspective on Manufacturing Productivity in India: 1980-81 to 2000-01," Indian Economic Review, Department of Economics, Delhi School of Economics, vol. 39(1), pages 203-237, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:dse:indecr:v:39:y:2004:i:1:p:203-237
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Arnab Deb, 2013. "Economic Reforms, Capacity Utilization, and Productivity Growth in Indian Manufacturing," Alumni working papers 2013-05, University of Connecticut, Department of Economics.
    2. Arnab K. Deb & Subhash C. Ray, 2013. "Economic Reforms and Total Factor Productivity Growth of Indian Manufacturing: An Inter-State Analysis," Working papers 2013-04, University of Connecticut, Department of Economics, revised Apr 2013.
    3. Choudhry, Sonam, 2021. "Is India's formal manufacturing sector ‘hollowing out’- importance of intermediate input," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 533-547.
    4. Subhash C. Ray & Arnab K. Deb & Kankana Mukherjee, 2021. "Unrestricted geometric distance functions and the Geometric Young productivity index: an analysis of Indian manufacturing," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 60(6), pages 3103-3134, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Productivity; Manufacturing; Economic Reforms; Growth; India.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • D24 - Microeconomics - - Production and Organizations - - - Production; Cost; Capital; Capital, Total Factor, and Multifactor Productivity; Capacity
    • O47 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Growth and Aggregate Productivity - - - Empirical Studies of Economic Growth; Aggregate Productivity; Cross-Country Output Convergence
    • O53 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economywide Country Studies - - - Asia including Middle East

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dse:indecr:v:39:y:2004:i:1:p:203-237. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Pami Dua (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/deudein.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.