IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/diw/diwwob/86-40-1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Vermögensungleichheit in Deutschland bleibt trotz deutlich steigender Nettovermögen anhaltend hoch

Author

Listed:
  • Markus M. Grabka
  • Christoph Halbmeier

Abstract

Das private Vermögen in Deutschland hat sich im Zeitraum von 2012 bis 2017 im Schnitt um nominal 22 Prozent erhöht. Das individuelle Nettovermögen in Deutschland betrug im Jahr 2017 im Durchschnitt rund 108 500 Euro für Personen ab 17 Jahren. Der Medianwert, der die untere von der oberen Hälfte der Vermögensverteilung trennt, liegt dagegen nur bei 26 000 Euro. Den Vermögensanstieg trieben vor allem Wertsteigerungen beim Betriebsvermögen und bei Immobilien. Die Vermögensungleichheit verharrt seit zehn Jahren auf einem auch im internationalen Vergleich hohen Niveau: Die reichsten zehn Prozent besitzen mehr als die Hälfte des gesamten Vermögens. Um die Ungleichheit zu reduzieren, müsste die Vermögensbildungspolitik neu aufgestellt werden, mit höheren Fördersummen und einer Neuausrichtung der privaten Altersvorsorge, die sich an Ländern wie Schweden orientiert, oder mit einem staatlichen Mietkaufmodell.

Suggested Citation

  • Markus M. Grabka & Christoph Halbmeier, 2019. "Vermögensungleichheit in Deutschland bleibt trotz deutlich steigender Nettovermögen anhaltend hoch," DIW Wochenbericht, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, vol. 86(40), pages 735-745.
    • Handle: RePEc:diw:diwwob:86-40-1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.diw.de/documents/publikationen/73/diw_01.c.679972.de/19-40-1.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Alkis Blanz & Ulrich Eydam & Maik Heinemann & Matthias Kalkuhl & Nikolaj Moretti, 2023. "Fiscal Policy and Energy Price Shocks," CEPA Discussion Papers 70, Center for Economic Policy Analysis.
    2. Lersch, Philipp M. & Grabka, Markus M. & Rüß, Kilian & Schröder, Carsten, 2021. "Wealth of children from single-parent families: Low levels and high inequality in Germany," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 31(5), pages 565-579.
    3. Judith Niehues & Maximilian Stockhausen, 2020. "Steigende Einkommen, sinkende Sorgen — die Zeit vor Corona," Wirtschaftsdienst, Springer;ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 100(4), pages 237-241, April.
    4. Albers, Thilo & Bartels, Charlotte & Schularick, Moritz, 2022. "Wealth and its Distribution in Germany, 1895-2018," CEPR Discussion Papers 17269, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    5. Ulrich Eydam, 2021. "The Distributional Implications of Climate Policies Under Uncertainty," CEPA Discussion Papers 33, Center for Economic Policy Analysis.
    6. Markus M. Grabka, 2021. "Ungleichheit der Haushaltsnettoeinkommen — Trends, Treiber, Politikmaßnahmen," Wirtschaftsdienst, Springer;ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 101(7), pages 508-515, July.
    7. Waitkus, Nora & Minkus, Lara, 2021. "Investigating the gender wealth gap across occupational classes," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 108206, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    8. Elisa Stumpf & Silke Uebelmesser, 2024. "Lifting the Veil of Ignorance – Survey Experiments on Preferences for Wealth Redistribution," CESifo Working Paper Series 11126, CESifo.
    9. Clemens, Marius & Röger, Werner, 2024. "What is the difference between fossil fuel embargo and price shocks?," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).
    10. Friedrich L. Sell, 2021. "Ist das neue Inflationsziel der EZB noch zeitgemäß?," Wirtschaftsdienst, Springer;ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 101(9), pages 688-691, September.
    11. Clemens, Marius & Röger, Werner, 2021. "Temporary VAT Reduction during the Lockdown - Evidence from Germany," VfS Annual Conference 2021 (Virtual Conference): Climate Economics 242459, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.
    12. Charlotte Bartels & Carsten Schroeder, 2020. "The role of rental income, real estate and rents for inequality in Germany," Working Papers 7, Forum New Economy.
    13. Feld, Lars P. & Schmidt, Christoph M. & Schnabel, Isabel & Truger, Achim & Wieland, Volker, 2019. "Den Strukturwandel meistern. Jahresgutachten 2019/20 [Dealing with Structural Change. Annual Report 2019/20]," Annual Economic Reports / Jahresgutachten, German Council of Economic Experts / Sachverständigenrat zur Begutachtung der gesamtwirtschaftlichen Entwicklung, volume 127, number 201920.
    14. Florian Hanke & Jens Lowitzsch, 2020. "Empowering Vulnerable Consumers to Join Renewable Energy Communities—Towards an Inclusive Design of the Clean Energy Package," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-27, April.
    15. Johannes Dolderer & Christian Felber & Petra Teitscheid, 2021. "From Neoclassical Economics to Common Good Economics," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-20, February.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Wealth Inequality; wealth portfolio; SOEP;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • D31 - Microeconomics - - Distribution - - - Personal Income and Wealth Distribution
    • I31 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Welfare, Well-Being, and Poverty - - - General Welfare, Well-Being

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:diw:diwwob:86-40-1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Bibliothek (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/diwbede.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.