IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/diw/diwvjh/69-40-8.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

From Factor of Production to Autonomous Industry: The Transformation of Germany's Software Sector

Author

Listed:
  • Mark Lehrer

Abstract

In recent months the German software industry has gained extensive public prominence for manifesting a phenomenon not seen on this scale in Germany for decades: a dire labor shortage. As even the general public has been made aware by the Bündnis für Arbeit, Germany’s information technology (IT) industries currently suffer a shortfall of about 75,000 software specialists.1 However, the focus of this article is not on the labor problems, but on the comparative characteristics of Germany’s software industry. Difficult though it is to delimit the exact boundaries and segments of the software industry in an age of widespread technological convergence and digitalization, what follows is an attempt to assess the comparative national profile of Germany’s software sector in three ways: first, by looking at the business segments that German software firms specialize in; second, by examining the nature of their various business strategies; and third, by considering the components of Germany’s “national system of innovation” in regard to software: education and training, government policy, and organized interest formations. All three aspects of the German software industry are in a state of rapid transformation, as reflected in the current German high-tech boom and the growth of the Neuer Markt. Hence the following characterization of the German software sector is very much that of an industry in transition. Wenngleich es heutzutage im Zeitalter der technologischen Konvergenz und Digitalisierung schwer ist, die Grenzen der Softwareindustrie genau festzulegen, soll im vorliegenden Beitrag versucht werden, das Profil des deutschen Softwaresektors unter drei verschiedenen Gesichtspunkten zu bestimmen: (1) hinsichtlich der Geschäftsfelder, auf die sich deutsche Softwarefirmen vornehmlich spezialisieren; (2) hinsichtlich der verschiedenen Unternehmensmodelle und -strategien im Softwaresektor, und (3) hinsichtlich der Komponenten des "nationalen Innovationssystems" im Bereich der Softwareproduktion. Diese drei Aspekte der deutschen Softwareindustrie befinden sich in einem rapiden Umwandlungsprozess. Daher beschreibt die folgende Charakterisierung des deutschen Softwaresektors durchaus eine Industrie im Übergang.

Suggested Citation

  • Mark Lehrer, 2000. "From Factor of Production to Autonomous Industry: The Transformation of Germany's Software Sector," Vierteljahrshefte zur Wirtschaftsforschung / Quarterly Journal of Economic Research, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, vol. 69(4), pages 587-600.
  • Handle: RePEc:diw:diwvjh:69-40-8
    DOI: 10.3790/vjh.69.4.587
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.3790/vjh.69.4.587
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.3790/vjh.69.4.587?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Simone Strambach, 2010. "Path Dependence and Path Plasticity: The Co-evolution of Institutions and Innovation – the German Customized Business Software Industry," Chapters, in: Ron Boschma & Ron Martin (ed.), The Handbook of Evolutionary Economic Geography, chapter 19, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    2. Ibert, Oliver, 2004. "Projects and firms as discordant complements: organisational learning in the Munich software ecology," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 33(10), pages 1529-1546, December.
    3. Simone Strambach & Cornelia Storz, 2008. "Pfadabhängigkeit und Pfadelastizität von Innovationssystemen: die deutsche und japanische Softwareindustrie," Vierteljahrshefte zur Wirtschaftsforschung / Quarterly Journal of Economic Research, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, vol. 77(2), pages 142-161.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:diw:diwvjh:69-40-8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Bibliothek (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/diwbede.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.