IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/dij/revfcs/v16y2013i2p45-71..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Management des parties prenantes, pro-activité environnementale et rentabilité:le cas du secteur des produits de grande consommation en France - Stakeholder management, corporate environmental proactivity and profitability:A food, beverage, household and personal products industries study in France

Author

Listed:
  • Franck Brulhart

    (Aix Marseille Université, CNRS, LEST 7317 et Toulouse Business School)

  • Sandrine Gherra

    (Groupe Sup de Co Montpellier Business School – Montpellier Research in Management)

Abstract

(VF)Notre article vise à améliorer la compréhension des liens entre la nature du management des parties prenantes, la pro-activité environnementale et la performance économique. En nous fondant sur la théorie des parties prenantes et la théorie des ressources, nous proposons un modèle « intégrateur » prenant en compte les interrelations entre ces différentes variables.Nos résultats montrent qu’un management différencié des parties prenantes (i.e. fondé sur une priorité accordée à un nombre limité de partie prenantes) améliore la rentabilité par le biais d’une influence positive directe sur le ROS (Return On Sales). En revanche l’orientation parties prenantes (i.e. fondée sur la mise en œuvre de relations étroites avec l’ensemble des parties prenantes) dégrade la rentabilité par le biais d’un effet direct négatif sur le ROS. Nous montrons également une influence positive de la pro-activité environnementale sur la rentabilité. Par ailleurs, nos résultats mettent en avant l’impact du management des parties prenantes (management différencié ou orientation parties prenantes) sur la rentabilité, lorsqu’il est intermédié par la pro-activité environnementale. Dans ce cas, l’impact indirect du management des parties prenantes sur la performance est opposé à son impact direct, et c’est l’effet direct qui est dominant.(VA)This article seeks to explore the relationship between stakeholder management, corporate environmental proactivity and profitability. Based on stakeholder theory and resource-based theory, we test an integrative model that takes into account the relationship between these variables. Our results show that a selective attention to stakeholders (prioritization of a small range of stakeholders) has a positive influence on profitability (direct impact on Return on Sales). But stakeholder orientation (management of a wide range of stakeholders) has a negative influence on ROS. Corporate environmental proactivity has a positive influence on profitability. Corporate environmental proactivity mediates the relationship between stakeholder management (stakeholder prioritization or stakeholder orientation) and profitability. In this case the direct impact of stakeholder management on profitability is opposite to its indirect impact and the direct impact prevails.

Suggested Citation

  • Franck Brulhart & Sandrine Gherra, 2013. "Management des parties prenantes, pro-activité environnementale et rentabilité:le cas du secteur des produits de grande consommation en France - Stakeholder management, corporate environmental proacti," Revue Finance Contrôle Stratégie, revues.org, vol. 16(2), pages 45-71, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:dij:revfcs:v:16:y:2013:i:2:p:45-71.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://fcs.revues.org/1336
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Béatrice Allirol & Pascal Dumontier, 2015. "Divulgations environnementales : quel référentiel pour quelles fins ?," Post-Print hal-01188541, HAL.
    2. Nicolas Madison & Eduardo Schiehll, 2021. "The Effect of Financial Materiality on ESG Performance Assessment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-21, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    parties prenantes; pro-activité environnementale; performance économique; théorie des ressources; orientation parties prenantes; stakeholders; corporate environmental proactivity; economic performance; resource-based theory; stakeholder orientation.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • M14 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - Corporate Culture; Diversity; Social Responsibility

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dij:revfcs:v:16:y:2013:i:2:p:45-71.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Informatique Technique MSH Dijon (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.revues.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.