Author
Listed:
- Catalina Torres
(Universidad de la República)
- Victoria Prieto Rosas
(Universidad de la República)
- Gonzalo De Armas
(Universidad de la República)
- Mariana Paredes
(Universidad de la República)
Abstract
Background: In 2020, as the SARS-CoV-2 virus spread globally, many countries around the world experienced substantial increases in mortality, including in Latin America. In that year, many non-pharmaceutical measures were implemented in Uruguay. The first COVID-19 vaccines were administered in February 2021. Uruguay has various characteristics that were pointed out as risk factors in the course of the pandemic, mainly an old population, high urbanization levels, and socioeconomic inequalities. Methods: We estimate the annual and monthly excess deaths and P-scores for 2020, 2021, and 2022. We also compute the sex-specific life expectancy gap between each one of those years and 2019, and we decompose the observed changes into the contributions from COVID-19 at different ages. Results: In contrast to what was observed in neighboring countries, Uruguay experienced a life-expectancy increase in 2020 as compared to 2019. However, life expectancy declined substantially in the country in 2021 and 2022. While most of the decline in 2021 is attributable to COVID-19, the cause-of-death profile of the losses in 2022 is more complex. Although both sexes were affected, women experienced a larger life-expectancy loss in 2022. Contribution: Previous studies about COVID-19 mortality in Latin America mention the particular case of Uruguay as a country that was barely affected by the pandemic in 2020. In fact, there were fewer deaths than expected that year. Here we extend the analysis until the end of 2022, showing that unlike the first pandemic year, there was a substantial mortality increase in Uruguay in 2021 and 2022.
Suggested Citation
Catalina Torres & Victoria Prieto Rosas & Gonzalo De Armas & Mariana Paredes, 2024.
"The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on mortality in Uruguay from 2020 to 2022,"
Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 51(29), pages 911-926.
Handle:
RePEc:dem:demres:v:51:y:2024:i:29
DOI: 10.4054/DemRes.2024.51.29
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dem:demres:v:51:y:2024:i:29. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Editorial Office (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.demogr.mpg.de/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.