IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/dem/demres/v50y2024i45.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Predictive utility of key family planning indicators on dynamic contraceptive outcomes: Results from longitudinal surveys in Burkina Faso, Kenya, Uganda, and Côte d'Ivoire

Author

Listed:
  • Amy Tsui

    (Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health)

  • Dana Sarnak

    (Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health)

  • Phil Anglewicz

    (Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health)

  • Fredrick Makumbi

    (Makerere University)

  • Georges Guiella

    (Université de Ouagadougou)

  • Peter Gichangi

    (International Center for Reproductive Health-Kenya (ICRH-K))

  • Rosine Mosso

    (École Nationale Supérieure de Statistique et d'Economie Appliquée (ENSEA))

  • Saifuddin Ahmed

    (Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health)

Abstract

Background: Many health and demographic surveys routinely collect information on women’s exposure to family planning (FP) messages, counseling on contraceptive side effects, discussions about FP with providers, contraceptive decision-making autonomy, and the desire for additional children. Several studies have shown significant associations with current contraceptive use status from these cross-sectional data. However, the predictive utility of these indicators on contraceptive use and its dynamics over time is not well-known, primarily due to the lack of longitudinal data. Objective: To empirically assess the predictive utility of key family planning indicators on contraceptive use outcomes using longitudinal data from women participating in national annual surveys in four sub-Saharan African countries. Methods: This study utilizes nationally representative longitudinal Performance and Monitoring for Action data collected in Kenya, Burkina Faso, Uganda, and Côte d’Ivoire from reproductive-age women to model the predictive influence of indicators measured at baseline on their subsequent contraceptive use (including intentions to use and method type) and contraceptive dynamics (including adoption, discontinuation, and switching) over an approximately three-year period. Results: Some indicators measured at baseline (e.g., FP media exposure and fertility preferences) consistently influenced women’s contraceptive adoption and intentions over two to three years of observation, but the predictive utility of most indictors was largely weak for dynamic outcomes such as switching and discontinuation. Contribution: Our study highlights a programmatic need to reconsider long-standing FP indicators given the mixed evidence of their influence on contraceptive behavior over time. We recommend the identification of key measures that can predict dynamic contraceptive behaviors established through longitudinal data to inform actionable interventions.

Suggested Citation

  • Amy Tsui & Dana Sarnak & Phil Anglewicz & Fredrick Makumbi & Georges Guiella & Peter Gichangi & Rosine Mosso & Saifuddin Ahmed, 2024. "Predictive utility of key family planning indicators on dynamic contraceptive outcomes: Results from longitudinal surveys in Burkina Faso, Kenya, Uganda, and Côte d'Ivoire," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 50(45), pages 1301-1352.
  • Handle: RePEc:dem:demres:v:50:y:2024:i:45
    DOI: 10.4054/DemRes.2024.50.45
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.demographic-research.org/volumes/vol50/45/50-45.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.4054/DemRes.2024.50.45?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    family planning; sub-Saharan Africa; contraception; longitudinal data; panel data; contraceptive use; methods; contraceptive discontinuation; Performance and Monitoring for Action (PMA) surveys; contraceptive adoption;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • J1 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demographic Economics
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dem:demres:v:50:y:2024:i:45. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Editorial Office (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.demogr.mpg.de/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.