IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/dem/demres/v49y2023i32.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The COVID-19 pandemic and fertility responses: TFR simulation analysis using parity progressions in South Korea

Author

Listed:
  • Seulki Choi

    (Korea Development Institute (KDI))

  • Da eun Kwan

    (Korea Development Institute (KDI))

  • Bongoh Kye

    (Kookmin University)

Abstract

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic has had a notable impact on marriage and fertility intentions. Existing research has found that the impact of the pandemic on childbearing intentions and outcomes has varied across countries. Yet it remains unclear what the post-COVID-19 fertility rate would be if the changes in childbearing intentions observed during the pandemic translated into corresponding behavioral changes. Objective: This study centered on the experience of South Korea, where an unprecedented decline in the total fertility rate (TFR) was recorded. We aim to examine changes in individuals’ marriage and childbearing intentions during the COVID-19 pandemic, and the implications of these changes for fertility rates. Methods: We used a combination of population census, vital statistics, and online survey data to examine shifts in marriage and fertility intentions among women of childbearing age during the COVID-19 pandemic. Simulation analysis was employed to explore various scenarios of intention changes regarding marriage and childbearing by parity. It was assumed that childbearing followed a sequential progression: from never married to high parities. Results: We found that during the COVID-19 pandemic, Korean women experienced a downward shift in their marriage and childbearing intentions on average. If these intention changes translate into corresponding behaviors, the TFR is estimated to fall to 0.754, using the TFR value from the base year of 2019. Conclusions: The results suggest that the TFR in South Korea is likely to decrease further if the intention changes translate into corresponding behavioral changes. Contribution: This study advances the existing literature by taking a life course approach and integrating survey results into a simulation to examine the pandemic-related effects on fertility. It provides a better understanding of shifts in individuals’ reproductive decisions during the crisis and the potential consequences on marriage and fertility patterns thereafter.

Suggested Citation

  • Seulki Choi & Da eun Kwan & Bongoh Kye, 2023. "The COVID-19 pandemic and fertility responses: TFR simulation analysis using parity progressions in South Korea," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 49(32), pages 849-864.
  • Handle: RePEc:dem:demres:v:49:y:2023:i:32
    DOI: 10.4054/DemRes.2023.49.32
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.demographic-research.org/volumes/vol49/32/49-32.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.4054/DemRes.2023.49.32?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    COVID-19; marriage intentions; fertility intentions; simulation;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • J1 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demographic Economics
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dem:demres:v:49:y:2023:i:32. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Editorial Office (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.demogr.mpg.de/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.