IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/dem/demres/v49y2023i21.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Calculating contraceptive prevalence and unmet need for family planning in low-fertility countries with the Generations and Gender Survey

Author

Listed:
  • Judith Koops

    (Nederlands Interdisciplinair Demografisch Instituut (NIDI))

Abstract

Background: In Europe, 10%‒40% of adults experience an unintended or sooner-than-intended birth. However, European research on family planning need and use is scarce. Objective: The Generations and Gender Survey is a cross-national panel survey collected in low-fertility settings in Europe, Asia, and South America. This paper demonstrates how to use this dataset to calculate family planning need and use and explores the possibility of comparison across countries and time. Methods: The paper provides a hands-on example of how to calculate contraceptive prevalence and unmet need for family planning using Generations and Gender Survey data collected in the Republic of Moldova in 2020. It also provides an overview of the differences between the questionnaires of the Generations and Gender Survey round II (collected in the 2020s), the Generations and Gender Survey round I (collected in the 2000s), the Fertility and Family Survey (collected in the 1990s), the World Fertility Survey (collected in the 1970s and 1980s), and the Demographic and Health Surveys (collected in the 1990s‒2020s). Conclusions: The Generations and Gender Survey is one of the few data sources that allows examining family planning need and use in European countries. The high comparability between the Generations and Gender Survey and other international demographic surveys provides ample opportunities to examine how family planning need and use varies across and within countries over time. The panel aspect of the Generations and Gender Survey can be used to expand knowledge about family planning need and use and their consequences. Contribution: Calculating contraceptive prevalence and unmet need for family planning can be difficult and time-consuming. By reducing this burden, this paper aims to stimulate family planning research in low-fertility settings and increase comparisons across countries and time.

Suggested Citation

  • Judith Koops, 2023. "Calculating contraceptive prevalence and unmet need for family planning in low-fertility countries with the Generations and Gender Survey," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 49(21), pages 543-564.
  • Handle: RePEc:dem:demres:v:49:y:2023:i:21
    DOI: 10.4054/DemRes.2023.49.21
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.demographic-research.org/volumes/vol49/21/49-21.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.4054/DemRes.2023.49.21?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    family planning; Europe; cross-national study; panel data; longitudinal data; Demographic and Health Surveys (DHS); Fertility and Family Survey (FFS); Generations and Gender Survey (GGS); World Fertility Survey; unplanned births;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • J1 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demographic Economics
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dem:demres:v:49:y:2023:i:21. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Editorial Office (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.demogr.mpg.de/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.