IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/dem/demres/v41y2019i49.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Educational reproduction in Europe: A descriptive account

Author

Listed:
  • Richard Breen

    (University of Oxford)

  • John Ermisch

    (University of Oxford)

  • Satu Helske

    (Turun Yliopisto (University of Turku))

Abstract

Background: Conventional studies of intergenerational social reproduction are based on a retrospective design, sampling adults and linking their status to that of their parents. This approach yields conditional estimates of intergenerational relationships. Recent studies have taken a prospective approach, following a birth cohort forward to examine how it is socially reproduced. This permits the estimation of relationships of social reproduction that do not condition on the existence of at least one child. Objective: We examine whether the relationship between conditional and unconditional estimates found for the United States and Great Britain also holds for a diverse range of European countries. Methods: We examine educational reproduction among men and women born 1930–1950 in 12 countries using data from the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe (SHARE) and compare unconditional and conditional estimates. Results: We find striking similarities in the relationship between unconditional and conditional estimates throughout Europe. Among women, the difference between conditional and unconditional estimates generally increased with education. Women with more education were less likely to reproduce themselves educationally because they were less likely to marry. The educational gradient, in terms of the probability of having a child who attained a tertiary degree, was more pronounced in the South and East of Europe than in the North and West. Conclusions: The gap between conditional and unconditional estimates indicates that the more common retrospective approach tends to overstate the extent of educational reproduction. Contribution: This is the first comparative study adopting a prospective approach to intergenerational social reproduction.

Suggested Citation

  • Richard Breen & John Ermisch & Satu Helske, 2019. "Educational reproduction in Europe: A descriptive account," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 41(49), pages 1373-1400.
  • Handle: RePEc:dem:demres:v:41:y:2019:i:49
    DOI: 10.4054/DemRes.2019.41.49
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.demographic-research.org/volumes/vol41/49/41-49.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.4054/DemRes.2019.41.49?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jiawei Wu & Guillaume Marois, 2024. "Education Policies and Intergenerational Educational Mobility in China: New Evidence for the 1986–95 Birth Cohort," Population Research and Policy Review, Springer;Southern Demographic Association (SDA), vol. 43(3), pages 1-12, June.
    2. Patrick Präg & Seongsoo Choi & Christiaan Monden, 2020. "The sibsize revolution in an international context: Declining social disparities in the number of siblings in 26 countries," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 43(17), pages 461-500.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    intergenerational; reproduction; intergenerational transmission; education; cross-national study;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • J1 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demographic Economics
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dem:demres:v:41:y:2019:i:49. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Editorial Office (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.demogr.mpg.de/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.