IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/dem/demres/v30y2014i9.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Modelling the constraints on consanguineous marriage when fertility declines

Author

Listed:
  • Bilal Barakat

    (Österreichische Akademie der Wissenschaften)

  • Stuart Gietel-Basten

    (Hong Kong University of Science and Technology)

Abstract

Background: Consanguinity - or marriage between close blood relatives, in particular first cousins - is widely practised and even socially encouraged in many countries. However, in the face of fertility transition where the number of cousins eligible to marry declines, how might such constraints on consanguinity develop in the future? Objective: Numerous studies have stated that the practice cannot continue at present levels and in ist present form in the face of fertility transition. However, the future impact of fertility transition on availability of cousins to marry has not yet been quantified. Methods: We perform a simulation exercise using past and projected net reproduction rates (NRRs) derived from the UN. We calculate the average number of cousins of the opposite sex as a function of the average number of children, the average probability of an individual having at least one eligible paternal cousin of the opposite sex, and conclude with an examination of constraints on consanguineous marriage in selected countries under different fertility assumptions. Results: Current and projected fertility levels in Middle Eastern countries will create challenging constraints on the custom once today's birth cohorts reach marriageable age. Conclusions: Either consanguinity prevalence will diminish significantly, or the institution will be forced to adapt by becoming more coercive in the face of reduced choice or at the expense of other social preferences (such as for an older groom wedding a younger bride). Fertility decline affects prospects for social change not only through its well-known consequences for mothers but also through shaping marriage conditions for the next generation.

Suggested Citation

  • Bilal Barakat & Stuart Gietel-Basten, 2014. "Modelling the constraints on consanguineous marriage when fertility declines," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 30(9), pages 277-312.
  • Handle: RePEc:dem:demres:v:30:y:2014:i:9
    DOI: 10.4054/DemRes.2014.30.9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.demographic-research.org/volumes/vol30/9/30-9.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.4054/DemRes.2014.30.9?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Arianna Dalzero & Bret A. Beheim & Hillard Kaplan & Jonathan Stieglitz & Paul L. Hooper & Cody T. Ross & Michael Gurven & Dieter Lukas, 2024. "Cross-cousin marriage among Tsimane forager–horticulturalists during demographic transition and market integration," Post-Print hal-04524409, HAL.
    2. Rania Salem & Sarah Shah, 2019. "Economic rationales for kin marriage: Assessing the evidence using Egyptian panel data," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 41(19), pages 545-578.
    3. Yara Jarallah, 2022. "The ties that bind? Marriage formation, consanguinity and war in Lebanon and Palestine," Journal of Population Research, Springer, vol. 39(1), pages 97-132, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    fertility transition; modelling; consanguineous marriage;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • J1 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demographic Economics
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dem:demres:v:30:y:2014:i:9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Editorial Office (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.demogr.mpg.de/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.