IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/dem/demres/v23y2010i11.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Measuring pregnancy planning

Author

Listed:
  • Corinne Rocca

    (University of California, San Francisco)

  • Suneeta Krishnan

    (RTI International)

  • Geraldine Barrett

    (Brunel University London)

  • Mark Wilson

    (University of California, Berkeley)

Abstract

We evaluated the psychometric properties of the London Measure of Unplanned Pregnancy among Indian women using classical methods and Item Response Modeling. The scale exhibited good internal consistency and internal structure, with overall scores correlating well with each item’s response categories. Items performed similarly for pregnant and non-pregnant women, and scores decreased with increasing parity, providing evidence for validity. Analyses detected small disadvantages, including low endorsement of middle response categories and some evidence of differential item functioning by parity. We conclude that the LMUP is suitable for use in India and recommend steps for improving scale performance for this cultural context.

Suggested Citation

  • Corinne Rocca & Suneeta Krishnan & Geraldine Barrett & Mark Wilson, 2010. "Measuring pregnancy planning," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 23(11), pages 293-334.
    • Handle: RePEc:dem:demres:v:23:y:2010:i:11
    DOI: 10.4054/DemRes.2010.23.11
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.demographic-research.org/volumes/vol23/11/23-11.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.4054/DemRes.2010.23.11?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jejeebhoy, Shireen J., 1998. "Adolescent sexual and reproductive behavior: a review of the evidence from India," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 46(10), pages 1275-1290, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Eman Almaghaslah & Roger Rochat & Ghada Farhat, 2017. "Validation of a pregnancy planning measure for Arabic-speaking women," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(10), pages 1-16, October.
    2. Adina Y Lang & Jennifer A Hall & Jacqueline A Boyle & Cheryce L Harrison & Helena Teede & Lisa J Moran & Geraldine Barrett, 2019. "Validation of the London Measure of Unplanned Pregnancy among pregnant Australian women," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(8), pages 1-14, August.
    3. Joline Goossens & Sofie Verhaeghe & Ann Van Hecke & Geraldine Barrett & Ilse Delbaere & Dimitri Beeckman, 2018. "Psychometric properties of the Dutch version of the London Measure of Unplanned Pregnancy in women with pregnancies ending in birth," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(4), pages 1-15, April.
    4. Diane Morof & Jody Steinauer & Sadia Haider & Sonia Liu & Philip Darney & Geraldine Barrett, 2012. "Evaluation of the London Measure of Unplanned Pregnancy in a United States Population of Women," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(4), pages 1-7, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Andrea Atencio & Darwin Cortés & Juan Gallego, 2015. "Gender differences on sexual behavior and school inputs: evidence from Bogota," Documentos de Trabajo 12437, Universidad del Rosario.
    2. Eleanor Hukin, 2014. "Cambodia's Fertility Transition: The Dynamics of Contemporary Childbearing," Population and Development Review, The Population Council, Inc., vol. 40(4), pages 605-628, December.
    3. Mukta Gundi & Malavika A Subramanyam, 2019. "Menstrual health communication among Indian adolescents: A mixed-methods study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(10), pages 1-22, October.
    4. Guang-zhen Wang & Vijayan Pillai, 2001. "Measurement of Women's Reproductive Health and Reproductive Rights: An Analysis of Developing Countries," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 54(1), pages 17-35, April.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    India; measurement; fertility intentions; pregnancy intention status; pregnancy planning; pregnancy intentions; Item Response Modeling; Item Response Theory;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • J1 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demographic Economics
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dem:demres:v:23:y:2010:i:11. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Editorial Office (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.demogr.mpg.de/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.