IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ddj/fserec/y2021p236-245.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Reducing Conflicts Created by Organizational Change Through Knowledge of Education Employee Personality

Author

Listed:
  • Nicolae (Stan) Ana-Maria

    (Valahia University of Targoviste, Romania)

  • Mihai (Vasile) Iuliana

    (Valahia University of Targoviste, Romania)

Abstract

Although the literature does not often directly address the relationship between organizational change and employee personality, it does identify areas where it affects organizational effectiveness. These findings provide new opportunities to further study the implications of personality in organizational change management. The challenge of developing an “availability for change†is to make the organization's members identify and modify ingrained perspectives or routines, overcome some conflicts and adapt to change, which is directly proportional to their personality. This paper seeks to identify how employee personality facilitates individual and organizational knowledge to overcome conflicts created by the challenges of change.

Suggested Citation

  • Nicolae (Stan) Ana-Maria & Mihai (Vasile) Iuliana, 2021. "Reducing Conflicts Created by Organizational Change Through Knowledge of Education Employee Personality," Risk in Contemporary Economy, "Dunarea de Jos" University of Galati, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, pages 236-245.
    • Handle: RePEc:ddj:fserec:y:2021:p:236-245
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.rce.feaa.ugal.ro/images/stories/RCE2021/Nicolae-Stan_Mihai-Vasile.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. R. A. Thiétart & B. Forgues, 1995. "Chaos Theory and Organization," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 6(1), pages 19-31, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Arianna Dal Forno & Ugo Merlone, 2021. "Envy effects on conflict dynamics in supervised work groups," Decisions in Economics and Finance, Springer;Associazione per la Matematica, vol. 44(2), pages 755-779, December.
    2. Sergey Samoilenko, 2008. "Information systems fitness and risk in IS development: Insights and implications from chaos and complex systems theories," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 10(3), pages 281-292, July.
    3. Verena Komander & Andreas König, 2024. "Organizations on stage: organizational research and the performing arts," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 74(1), pages 303-352, February.
    4. Kevin J. Dooley & Andrew H. Van de Ven, 1999. "Explaining Complex Organizational Dynamics," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 10(3), pages 358-372, June.
    5. Laure Cabantous & Jean-Pascal Gond, 2011. "Rational Decision Making as Performative Praxis: Explaining Rationality's Éternel Retour," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 22(3), pages 573-586, June.
    6. Bischi, Gian Italo & Gardini, Laura & Kopel, Michael, 2000. "Analysis of global bifurcations in a market share attraction model," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 24(5-7), pages 855-879, June.
    7. Franklin M. Lartey, 2020. "Chaos, Complexity, and Contingency Theories: A Comparative Analysis and Application to the 21st Century Organization," Journal of Business Administration Research, Journal of Business Administration Research, Sciedu Press, vol. 9(1), pages 44-51, April.
    8. Gaim, Medhanie & Wåhlin, Nils, 2016. "In search of a creative space: A conceptual framework of synthesizing paradoxical tensions," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 32(1), pages 33-44.
    9. repec:spo:wpmain:info:hdl:2441/2ilfdosc5a9umpcja7bbsturuq is not listed on IDEAS
    10. Philip Anderson, 1999. "Perspective: Complexity Theory and Organization Science," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 10(3), pages 216-232, June.
    11. repec:hal:spmain:info:hdl:2441/2ilfdosc5a9umpcja7bbsturuq is not listed on IDEAS
    12. Alain Desreumaux, 2008. "Refaire de la stratégie?," Revue Finance Contrôle Stratégie, revues.org, vol. 11(Special), pages 67-107, June.
    13. Godfrey Cadogan, 2014. "Chaos in a Large System of Decision‐Makers with Heterogeneous Beliefs with Application to Index Option Prices," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(4), pages 487-501, July.
    14. repec:dau:papers:123456789/13444 is not listed on IDEAS
    15. Fruchter, Gila E. & Wiszniewska-Matyszkiel, Agnieszka, 2024. "How responsive should a firm be to customers’ expectations?," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 314(1), pages 323-339.
    16. Benoit Morel & Rangaraj Ramanujam, 1999. "Through the Looking Glass of Complexity: The Dynamics of Organizations as Adaptive and Evolving Systems," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 10(3), pages 278-293, June.
    17. Soufyane Frimousse & Hugo Gaillard, 2021. "Chaotic world: beyond resilience, towards antifragility [Monde chaotique : au-delà de la résilience, vers l’antifragilité]," Post-Print hal-03227021, HAL.
    18. Richard Shearmur & William Coffey & Christian Dube & Rémy Barbonne, 2007. "Intrametropolitan Employment Structure: Polycentricity, Scatteration, Dispersal and Chaos in Toronto, Montreal and Vancouver, 1996-2001," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 44(9), pages 1713-1738, August.
    19. Sealy-O’Donnell, Sue, 2015. "Backstage – the play within a play: Utilising a dramaturgical metaphor to consider the rapid development of team culture in short-term stage crews," MBA Research Papers 19381, Victoria University of Wellington, School of Management.
    20. Peter Woensel & Dick Gilder & Peter Besselaar & Peter Groenewegen, 2017. "Managerial influence on attitude formation in organizations: how to manage emergence," Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, Springer, vol. 23(4), pages 496-523, December.
    21. Madhu Acharyya & Chris Brady, 2014. "Designing an Enterprise Risk Management Curriculum for Business Studies: Insights From a Pilot Program," Risk Management and Insurance Review, American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 17(1), pages 113-136, March.
    22. Karen J. Alter, 2022. "The promise and perils of theorizing international regime complexity in an evolving world," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 17(2), pages 375-396, April.
    23. Bernard Forgues, 2018. "Kant in pyjamas : Keeping a compass in a changing academic world," Post-Print hal-02312267, HAL.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ddj:fserec:y:2021:p:236-245. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Gianina Mihai (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fegalro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.