IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ddj/fseeai/y2021i2p210-219.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analysis of the Performance Management of the Activity of Political Parties in Romania - Balance Score Card for Political Organizations

Author

Listed:
  • Ecaterina Cornelia UNGUREANU

    (Dunărea de Jos University of Galati, Romania)

  • Andi MIHALACHE

    (Dunărea de Jos University of Galati, Romania)

  • Daniel TECU

    (Dunărea de Jos University of Galati, Romania)

  • Ionica SIMBANU

    (Dunărea de Jos University of Galati, Romania)

Abstract

Given that the current political parties are going through a general period of erosion, there is a need to develop a system of performance indicators, applicable to the activity of political organizations, in order to evaluate the results of these entities. The research aims at analyzing effective management tools and techniques used in economic organizations and adapting them to the specific nature of the activity of political parties in Romania. To this end, a review of international literature and available case studies was conducted. The paper customizes the strategic model for measuring Balanced Scorecard performance, from the perspective of a political party, in order to streamline processes. The research aims to quantify the performance of a political party, by designing a balanced plan of indicators specific to a political organization. The proposed version of the model represents a real basis for performance monitoring and can be a viable alternative to the current evaluation methods used by Romanian political parties in analyzing the results of the activity.

Suggested Citation

  • Ecaterina Cornelia UNGUREANU & Andi MIHALACHE & Daniel TECU & Ionica SIMBANU, 2021. "Analysis of the Performance Management of the Activity of Political Parties in Romania - Balance Score Card for Political Organizations," Economics and Applied Informatics, "Dunarea de Jos" University of Galati, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, issue 2, pages 210-219.
    • Handle: RePEc:ddj:fseeai:y:2021:i:2:p:210-219
    DOI: 10.35219/eai15840409213
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.eia.feaa.ugal.ro/images/eia/2021_2/UngureanuMihalacheTecuSimbanu.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.35219/eai15840409213?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Roller, Edeltraud, 2005. "The Performance of Democracies: Political Institutions and Public Policy," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780199286423.
    2. Moe, Terry M, 1990. "Political Institutions: The Neglected Side of the Story," The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, Oxford University Press, vol. 6(0), pages 213-253.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pablo T. Spiller, 2003. "The Institutional Foundations of Public Policy: A Transactions Approach with Application to Argentina," The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, Oxford University Press, vol. 19(2), pages 281-306, October.
    2. repec:bla:jcmkts:v:47:y:2009:i::p:483-506 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Strausz, Roland, 2009. "The political economy of regulatory risk," SFB 649 Discussion Papers 2009-040, Humboldt University Berlin, Collaborative Research Center 649: Economic Risk.
    4. Kertzman, Ed & Janssen, Richard & Ruster, Marijn, 2003. "E-business in health care: does it contribute to strengthen consumer interest?," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 64(1), pages 63-73, April.
    5. André Kaiser, 1997. "Types of Democracy," Journal of Theoretical Politics, , vol. 9(4), pages 419-444, October.
    6. Eckert, Sandra, 2020. "EU agencies in banking and energy between institutional and policy centralisation," SAFE Working Paper Series 278, Leibniz Institute for Financial Research SAFE.
    7. Bueno de Mesquita, Ethan & Landa, Dimitri, 2015. "Political accountability and sequential policymaking," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 95-108.
    8. Miltos Makris, 2003. "Administrative Bureaus with Standard Operating Procedures," The Centre for Market and Public Organisation 03/062, The Centre for Market and Public Organisation, University of Bristol, UK.
    9. Ingolfur Blühdorn & Michael Deflorian, 2019. "The Collaborative Management of Sustained Unsustainability: On the Performance of Participatory Forms of Environmental Governance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-17, February.
    10. Peter Bils, 2020. "Policymaking with Multiple Agencies," American Journal of Political Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 64(3), pages 634-648, July.
    11. Monios, Jason & Lambert, Bruce, 2013. "The Heartland Intermodal Corridor: public private partnerships and the transformation of institutional settings," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 27(C), pages 36-45.
    12. Carlos Scartascini & Mariano Tommasi & Ernesto H. Stein, 2008. "Veto Players, Intertemporal Interactions and Policy Adaptability: How Do Political Institutions Work?," Research Department Publications 4593, Inter-American Development Bank, Research Department.
    13. Mariano Tommasi, 2003. "Crises, institutions politiques et réformes politiques : le bon, le mauvais et l'affreux," Revue d’économie du développement, De Boeck Université, vol. 11(2), pages 49-81.
    14. Ashok Chakravarti, 2012. "Institutions, Economic Performance and the Visible Hand," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 14751.
    15. Mariano Tommasi & Pablo T. Spiller & Ernesto Stein, 2003. "Political Institutions, Policymaking Processes, and Policy Outcomes. An Intertemporal Transactions Framework," Working Papers 59, Universidad de San Andres, Departamento de Economia, revised Jul 2003.
    16. Lio, Monchi & Liu, Meng-Chun, 2008. "Governance and agricultural productivity: A cross-national analysis," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 33(6), pages 504-512, December.
    17. Lindemann, Henrik, 2015. "Budgetary Interests and the Degree of Unbundling in Electricity Markets - An Empirical Analysis for OECD Countries," Hannover Economic Papers (HEP) dp-543, Leibniz Universität Hannover, Wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Fakultät.
    18. Lars P. Feld & Stefan Voigt, 2004. "Making Judges Independent – Some Proposals Regarding the Judiciary," CESifo Working Paper Series 1260, CESifo.
    19. Paul Pennings, 2010. "Exploring Variations in the Political Discourse on Public Sector Reforms, 1981--2005," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(2), pages 173-190, March.
    20. Rajeev K. Goel & Michael A. Nelson, 2023. "Which political regimes foster entrepreneurship? An international examination," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 48(1), pages 126-146, February.
    21. Susan Newberry, 2003. "`Sector Neutrality‘ and NPM‘Incentives’: Their Use in Eroding the Public Sector," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 13(30), pages 28-34, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ddj:fseeai:y:2021:i:2:p:210-219. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Gianina Mihai (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fegalro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.