IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/dcu/journl/v9y2015i2p88-98.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Romanian Constitutionalism Influence On The Constitutionalism Of The Republic Of Moldova

Author

Listed:
  • Camelia-Nicoleta Olteanu

Abstract

Regardless of the recent speculated views on the interest of the governments of the two countries situated on the right and the left of the Prut river and in spite of the Romanians’ declared or not solidarity, whose fates were separated conjecturally, we can not ignore the umbilical link between the two states whose citizens have benefited from reforming ideas translated into projects with a real constitutional value and subsequently into fundamental judicial acts adopted in 1866 and 1923. The paper presents the common constitutional evolution as well as the analysis of the two fundamental legal acts in force in Romania and the Republic of Moldova. The steps of the analysis are twofold: the former illustrates, formally, the weight of the texts considered relevant to the various components of the economic and social life of the peoples of the two countries, and the latter, illustrates, from the conceptual point of view, the measure of the differences between the articles. This paper is part of some extensive personal research, which concluded with the author’s doctoral thesis “Democracy in the Romanian constitutional theory and practice during 1866 – 2003”. Because the topic is really important nowadays, we have found it necessary to continue our research with more attention, reassessing certain ideas and comments.

Suggested Citation

  • Camelia-Nicoleta Olteanu, 2015. "Romanian Constitutionalism Influence On The Constitutionalism Of The Republic Of Moldova," FIAT IUSTITIA, Dimitrie Cantemir Faculty of Law Cluj Napoca, Romania, vol. 9(2), pages 88-98, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:dcu:journl:v:9:y:2015:i:2:p:88-98
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://fiatiustitia.ro/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/220-Article-Text-420-1-10-20160108.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dcu:journl:v:9:y:2015:i:2:p:88-98. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dimitrie Cantemir Faculty of Law Cluj Napoca, Romania (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://fiatiustitia.ro .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.