IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/dcu/journl/v9y2015i2p74-82.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Alteration Of The On-Going Public Procurements Contract

Author

Listed:
  • Eugenia Iovanas

Abstract

Without having the purpose to perform an exhaustive analysis of the legal dispositions identified in the normative act subject to analysis, we resume to the capitalization of the law issue. which wc consider to be relevant for our study. anThe administrative contract has been defined as that "agreement of will, between a public authority, found on a ie «al superiority position, on one hancl, and by public law subjects on the other hand (iadividuals, companies or other state organs. subordinated to the other party), by which it is followed the satisfaction of a general interest, by providing public services, performing a public work or improving a public asset, subject to a public power regime. Regarding the nature of the public procurement contract as being of administrative nature, still in the doctrine, through particular features of this contract mainly it was considered the special procedure wh»ch is being realized, foreseen by the Uovernment Emergency Ordinance 36/2006, regarding public procurements, correlated to the Government Emergency Ordinance 60/2011, which regulated the competence to trial the litigations arose based on it, commissioned to the courts of administrative legal departmentd which generates divergent interpretations in practice.

Suggested Citation

  • Eugenia Iovanas, 2015. "Alteration Of The On-Going Public Procurements Contract," FIAT IUSTITIA, Dimitrie Cantemir Faculty of Law Cluj Napoca, Romania, vol. 9(2), pages 74-82, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:dcu:journl:v:9:y:2015:i:2:p:74-82
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://fiatiustitia.ro/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/218-Article-Text-416-1-10-20160108.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dcu:journl:v:9:y:2015:i:2:p:74-82. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dimitrie Cantemir Faculty of Law Cluj Napoca, Romania (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://fiatiustitia.ro .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.