IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/dcu/journl/v9y2015i2p154-157.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Reflections Upon The Legal Norm Included In Article 215(2) Letter D In The Code Of Criminal Procedure, In The Context Of The Implications Generated By Its Equivocal Character

Author

Listed:
  • Corina-Cristina Buzdugan
  • Camelia Reghini

Abstract

Starting from a practical case, the article aims at submitting to examination the way, debatable in our opinion, in which the lawmaker has understood to regulate, in the context of legal supervision, the defendant’s obligation of non-communicating either directly or indirectly, by any means, with certain persons. More exactly, the purpose of our initiative is to underline the fact that the legal norm should have a predictable character, because, otherwise, it may generate consequences of a considerable gravity for the person it is addressed to.

Suggested Citation

  • Corina-Cristina Buzdugan & Camelia Reghini, 2015. "Reflections Upon The Legal Norm Included In Article 215(2) Letter D In The Code Of Criminal Procedure, In The Context Of The Implications Generated By Its Equivocal Character," FIAT IUSTITIA, Dimitrie Cantemir Faculty of Law Cluj Napoca, Romania, vol. 9(2), pages 154-157, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:dcu:journl:v:9:y:2015:i:2:p:154-157
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://fiatiustitia.ro/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/231-Article-Text-446-1-10-20160315.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dcu:journl:v:9:y:2015:i:2:p:154-157. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dimitrie Cantemir Faculty of Law Cluj Napoca, Romania (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://fiatiustitia.ro .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.