IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/dcu/journl/v9y2015i1p90-101.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Selective Distribution Agreement

Author

Listed:
  • Carmen Oana Mihaila

Abstract

The commercial distribution agreement and the framework agreement have been approached very rarely in our speciality literature. However, an analysis of commercial distribution as a modern form of long-term trade between suppliers and distributors reveals that these contracts are absolutely necessary in this process, where the middlemen make the trade more efficient, strengthen market positions, help penetrating new markets and attract and build customer loyalty. The selective distribution system thus facilitates the producers` access to the extended market. The producers will choose those distributors that best meet objective qualitative, quantitative and non-discriminatory selection criteria. The selective distribution is most suitable for distributing branded finished products (e.g. luxury products and sophisticated devices). The main shortcoming of this system is its incapacity to cover the entire market; for this reason, the producer has to make sure that the final user/consumer can easily identify the distributors, otherwise they might miss the trade opportunity. Of the utmost importance is the validity of the selective distribution system which depends on its compatibility with the free competition principle, a benefit of economy as a whole.

Suggested Citation

  • Carmen Oana Mihaila, 2015. "The Selective Distribution Agreement," FIAT IUSTITIA, Dimitrie Cantemir Faculty of Law Cluj Napoca, Romania, vol. 9(1), pages 90-101, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:dcu:journl:v:9:y:2015:i:1:p:90-101
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://fiatiustitia.ro/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/195-Article-Text-374-1-10-20151105.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dcu:journl:v:9:y:2015:i:1:p:90-101. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dimitrie Cantemir Faculty of Law Cluj Napoca, Romania (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://fiatiustitia.ro .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.