IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/dcu/journl/v9y2015i1p48-56.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

ANALYSIS OF THE CRIME STIPULATED IN ART. 50 OF LAW Nb. 129/1992 PROTECTING DRAWINGS AND MODELS, AS AMENDED BY LAW Nb. 187/2012 ENFORCING LAW Nb. 286/2009 ON THE CRIMINAL CODE

Author

Listed:
  • Bujorel Florea

Abstract

The study analyzes the changes made by Law no. 187/2012 enforcing Law no. 286/2009 on the Criminal Code for the crime concerning the unlawful acquirement of the authorship of the design or model, a crime stipulated in art. 50 of Law no. 129/1992 on the protection of designs and models. The changes made to the investigated crime are analyzed in terms of the grounds establishing them, as well in terms of the incidence of the legal norms of the current Criminal Code over them. The characteristic elements, i.e. the particularities of the crime, such as those listed below, are approached in a similar way: social relations protected by crime, the material subject matter and the subjects of the crime, the constituent contents thereof. The doctrinarian ideas on the matter are emphasized and re-assessed, and, as appropriate, the author’s personal opinions are stated. The study is directed simultaneously towards theoreticians, practitioners, and law school students, based on the assumption that adequate knowledge of the legal provisions ensures the accurate enforcement thereof and, therefore, the fulfillment of the scope for which they were adopted.

Suggested Citation

  • Bujorel Florea, 2015. "ANALYSIS OF THE CRIME STIPULATED IN ART. 50 OF LAW Nb. 129/1992 PROTECTING DRAWINGS AND MODELS, AS AMENDED BY LAW Nb. 187/2012 ENFORCING LAW Nb. 286/2009 ON THE CRIMINAL CODE," FIAT IUSTITIA, Dimitrie Cantemir Faculty of Law Cluj Napoca, Romania, vol. 9(1), pages 48-56, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:dcu:journl:v:9:y:2015:i:1:p:48-56
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://fiatiustitia.ro/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/190-Article-Text-364-1-10-20151105.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dcu:journl:v:9:y:2015:i:1:p:48-56. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dimitrie Cantemir Faculty of Law Cluj Napoca, Romania (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://fiatiustitia.ro .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.