IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/dcu/journl/v9y2015i1p213-223.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Judge-Made Law And The Effective Legal System

Author

Listed:
  • Antal Visegrady

Abstract

There is no doubt that each legal system has to face the fact of the role of judicial practice in the legal changesand the Central-Eastern European region is no exception.Judicial practice in Central-Eastern Europe develops the legal system in two ways. In the strict sense, by producing congruence between the changing social-economic relations and the corresponding, unchanged legal regulation. In the broad sense, judicial practice develops the legal system by bringing the already regulated and unchanged conditions of life into harmony with legal norms reflecting them in a inadequate – too narrow or too broad –form.The main spheres and forms of the judicial development of law are the interpretation, the concretization, and the individualization of legal rules, the filling of legal gaps by way of analogy, and the setting of examples of equity. The means of the judicial development of law are the interpretation of legal rules and the so-called analogia legis and iuris. The main conclusion which can be drawn from the above said is, that judicial practice – by means of its law-developing role – may contribute to the advancement of the effectiveness of law to a great extent.On the basis of all these, we believe that the perspectives of the development of Central Eastern European legal systems lie in the conscious combination of the legislative and judicial development of law. Classification-JEL:

Suggested Citation

  • Antal Visegrady, 2015. "Judge-Made Law And The Effective Legal System," FIAT IUSTITIA, Dimitrie Cantemir Faculty of Law Cluj Napoca, Romania, vol. 9(1), pages 213-223, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:dcu:journl:v:9:y:2015:i:1:p:213-223
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://fiatiustitia.ro/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/207-Article-Text-398-1-10-20151105.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dcu:journl:v:9:y:2015:i:1:p:213-223. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dimitrie Cantemir Faculty of Law Cluj Napoca, Romania (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://fiatiustitia.ro .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.