IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/dcu/journl/v9y2015i1p129-133.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Need Of Regulation Of The Teleworking Contract In The Romanian Legislation

Author

Listed:
  • Dan Top
  • Lavinia Savu

Abstract

In the Romanian labour legislation there is no legislation on telework, which is the activity performed by a person in other place than the place determined by the employer. It differs from domestic work, which is governed by the Labour Code (Art. 108-110) because the employer is not entitled to check directly the activity of the employee and the working can be done outside the home of the employee. A practical application is teleworking, a form of ongoing recent work, characterized by the fact that the employee operates regularly external from the employer using information technologies in connection with the employer's computer network, but with a very low scope, only on distance education or in computer programming or activity which does not yet know its own national legislation, at European level being only a framework agreement concluded in 2002 between the social partners who use this form of deployment of labour. There is a need for appropriate regulation of such activities, covering not only work from home (home office) but also via computer work, that work carried out through information technology because there is growing interest in this area, which is very useful in Romanian government, public power prerogatives, we think they could be successful through telework.

Suggested Citation

  • Dan Top & Lavinia Savu, 2015. "Need Of Regulation Of The Teleworking Contract In The Romanian Legislation," FIAT IUSTITIA, Dimitrie Cantemir Faculty of Law Cluj Napoca, Romania, vol. 9(1), pages 129-133, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:dcu:journl:v:9:y:2015:i:1:p:129-133
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://fiatiustitia.ro/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/199-Article-Text-382-1-10-20151105.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dcu:journl:v:9:y:2015:i:1:p:129-133. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dimitrie Cantemir Faculty of Law Cluj Napoca, Romania (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://fiatiustitia.ro .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.