IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/dcu/journl/v9y2013i1p61-62.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Dreptul Ca Ştiinţă Interdisciplinară Justiţia Şi Literatura (Iii) Tema Procesului În Justiţie Şi Literatură: Franz Kafka

Author

Listed:
  • Ioana Sasu Bolba

Abstract

The present paper proposes to discuss the efficiency of legal norms, but not from the viewpoint of those who create them, but of those for whom they are made and supposed to act upon. This can be done either by interviewing people who had to do with the law, or approaching domains in which this aspect was analyzed. One of them undoubtedly is literature. From many literary examples of how legal norms act upon people, we chose Franz Kafka’s well‐known novel “The Trial”. The plot suggests that both laws and the way they are applied does not create the natural state of wellbeing and justice, but, on the contrary, confusion, misunderstanding and eventually fear. The “efficiency” of laws consists, in the case we have chosen, in the main character being sentenced to death without being guilty or, even worse, without having the slightest idea why he was brought to justice. For him being in a trial will be, like for the author himself, a great paradox. The conclusion of the novel is nevertheless exaggerated, but still we cannot avoid thinking how many of those being tried (not always being charged with murder, theft, rape, etc.) actually understand what is going on or what was the efficiency of legal norms in their particular case!

Suggested Citation

  • Ioana Sasu Bolba, 2013. "Dreptul Ca Ştiinţă Interdisciplinară Justiţia Şi Literatura (Iii) Tema Procesului În Justiţie Şi Literatură: Franz Kafka," FIAT IUSTITIA, Dimitrie Cantemir Faculty of Law Cluj Napoca, Romania, vol. 9(1), pages 61-62, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:dcu:journl:v:9:y:2013:i:1:p:61-62
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://fiatiustitia.ro/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/128-Article-Text-237-1-10-20131227.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dcu:journl:v:9:y:2013:i:1:p:61-62. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dimitrie Cantemir Faculty of Law Cluj Napoca, Romania (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://fiatiustitia.ro .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.