IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/dcu/journl/v9y2013i1p17-25.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Efficiency Of Legal Norms In The Activity Of Public Administration

Author

Listed:
  • Elena Mihaela FODOR

Abstract

act Legal relations between the public administration and private persons are characterised by the higher‐level position of the administration which can impose its will. This is why, one of the most important principles in the activity of public administration is the principle of legality, meaning that the whole activity is organised and conducted by law. “The law” is in fact the legal norm. Identifying the legal norm that is to be applied to a particular situation is not always easy, as in order to achieve this goal the national legislation, the international conventions that Romania has adhered to, the jurisprudence of the international courts that enforce the international conventions, the European Union acts with direct effect at a national level have to be considered. Many times a control of the compliance of the legal norm with the hierarchy of legal norms, or an interpretation of the legal norm is needed. Who is entrusted with these tasks? What are the powers of the public administration in this area? How is the effectiveness of a legal norm determined by the activity of the public administration? The paper considers these questions.

Suggested Citation

  • Elena Mihaela FODOR, 2013. "The Efficiency Of Legal Norms In The Activity Of Public Administration," FIAT IUSTITIA, Dimitrie Cantemir Faculty of Law Cluj Napoca, Romania, vol. 9(1), pages 17-25, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:dcu:journl:v:9:y:2013:i:1:p:17-25
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://fiatiustitia.ro/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/134-Article-Text-249-1-10-20131227.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dcu:journl:v:9:y:2013:i:1:p:17-25. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dimitrie Cantemir Faculty of Law Cluj Napoca, Romania (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://fiatiustitia.ro .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.