IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/dcu/journl/v8y2014i1p229-239.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Teleological Interpretation And The Discovery Of The Constitution’S Efficiency Meanings

Author

Listed:
  • Lucian­Sorin STĂNESCU

Abstract

Surprisingly, the judicial research seems to have stopped with the approach of the interpretation methodology at the level of the legal norms in general, paying less attention to this field of law at the level of the norms contained in the supreme law in the hierarchy of the law system. In the Romanian doctrine there is a single and beneficiary monograph focused on the constitution interpretation1 that, noticing the existence of the premise that we stated above, makes an inventory of the interpretation methods for the fundamental law based on general valid guiding marks from the law theory and jurisprudence of the Constitutional Court of Romania. Starting from the observation that the inventory of this monograph lacks just the teleological interpretation, the present study makes an introduction to the epistemological horizon of this interpretative method and it aims to identify the purposes and the principles of the Constitution, as well as the relation between them and the spirit of the fundamental law. The connection between the teleological interpretation method and the constitution efficiency notion may be given by the extent of the immanent purposes’ accomplishment of the fundamental law in the meaning of ensuring an equilibrium state issued by the primary sense of the Pareto optimum among the state powers, among individuals and between the state and the individuals. This equilibrium state is the direct result of the institution of effective mutual control forms between powers, of the governors by the governed and the citizens’ participation to the public decision process.

Suggested Citation

  • Lucian­Sorin STĂNESCU, 2014. "The Teleological Interpretation And The Discovery Of The Constitution’S Efficiency Meanings," FIAT IUSTITIA, Dimitrie Cantemir Faculty of Law Cluj Napoca, Romania, vol. 8(1), pages 229-239, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:dcu:journl:v:8:y:2014:i:1:p:229-239
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://fiatiustitia.ro/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/172-Article-Text-323-1-10-20150302.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dcu:journl:v:8:y:2014:i:1:p:229-239. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dimitrie Cantemir Faculty of Law Cluj Napoca, Romania (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://fiatiustitia.ro .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.