IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/dcu/journl/v8y2014i1p159-165.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Noţiunea De Funcţie Publică Potrivit Noului Cod Penal Român, Raportat La Reglementările Anterioare

Author

Listed:
  • Oana Racolța

Abstract

This survey intends to analyse the meaning of “public function” notion, as well as of assimilate concepts or concepts legally related to this notion, considering the legislative evolution lately occurred in Romania, both in penal law field, where the setting of the New Penal Code resulted in major amendments, and in administrative law field, where this notion is particularly and differently featured. I also put forward the membership of Romanian legal professions to the “public function” field, which is, from the legal liability point of view, important for penal data providing this quality of active or even passive subject, representing in the same time a requisite for legal liability. The difference between previous regulations and the New Penal Code is obvious, currently the regulation norm being more complex than formerly. The survey also presents the overview of European law on the “public function” notion, as well as the comparative review between this law and the Romanian internal regulations.

Suggested Citation

  • Oana Racolța, 2014. "Noţiunea De Funcţie Publică Potrivit Noului Cod Penal Român, Raportat La Reglementările Anterioare," FIAT IUSTITIA, Dimitrie Cantemir Faculty of Law Cluj Napoca, Romania, vol. 8(1), pages 159-165, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:dcu:journl:v:8:y:2014:i:1:p:159-165
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://fiatiustitia.ro/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/166-Article-Text-313-1-10-20150302.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dcu:journl:v:8:y:2014:i:1:p:159-165. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dimitrie Cantemir Faculty of Law Cluj Napoca, Romania (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://fiatiustitia.ro .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.