IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/dcu/journl/v8y2014i1p151-158.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Efficiency Of Legal Norms Regarding The Fiscal Surveillance And Prudence. Constitutional Challenges For Romania

Author

Listed:
  • Alexandra PLEŞEA­CREŢAN

Abstract

Without any doubt, the biggest challenge of the last decade for the international community had been the economic crisis which emerged in 2008 and generated a set of effects still felt by the states today. Although the European Union had rules designed to maintain a balanced public debt and deficit, they proved inefficient and easy to avoid. Therefore, when the crisis debalanced the world economy, the EU member states found themselves with a set of rules which failed to secure the recovery of their economies. Under this circumstance, the European Union developed a new agreement regarding the fiscal governance, having as main purpose the maintenance of a fiscal balance by ensuring a public debt no higher than 60% of the Gross Domestic Product (GDP) and a public deficit no higher than 3% of the national GDP. Considering the length and the complexity of the European crisis, the European Union recommended for the states to establish these limits which should assure not just the fiscal balance, but the equilibrium of the entire economy in their constitutions in order to give much more power to these European rules. Analyzing this context, is Romania, as member of the European Union, able to provide an efficient constitutional framework for the limitations of the public debt and deficit determined by the EU? This is a question which remains to receive an answer in the following paper.

Suggested Citation

  • Alexandra PLEŞEA­CREŢAN, 2014. "The Efficiency Of Legal Norms Regarding The Fiscal Surveillance And Prudence. Constitutional Challenges For Romania," FIAT IUSTITIA, Dimitrie Cantemir Faculty of Law Cluj Napoca, Romania, vol. 8(1), pages 151-158, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:dcu:journl:v:8:y:2014:i:1:p:151-158
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://fiatiustitia.ro/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/165-Article-Text-311-1-10-20150302.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dcu:journl:v:8:y:2014:i:1:p:151-158. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dimitrie Cantemir Faculty of Law Cluj Napoca, Romania (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://fiatiustitia.ro .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.