IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/dcu/journl/v8y2013i2p82-92.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Eşecul Unui Experiment Administrativ Antebelic Din Munţii Apuseni - Staţiunea Aristocratică Măgura A Trezoreriei Maghiare O Comparaţie Cu Modelele Administrative Ale Staţiunilor Păltiniş Şi Bistra

Author

Listed:
  • Mircea DRAGOTEANU

Abstract

The beginnings of organized tourism in the Transylvanian Alps highlighted the importance of administrative organization for the development and even for the lasting of the new resorts and lodges established at the end of the 19th Century. Măgura summer resort in the Western Carpathian Mountains was founded by the Hungarian Treasury following a pattern essentially aristocratic and ethnic. They provided lands to the Hungarian elite, predominantly from Cluj, to build rest houses with closed circuit. This beautiful resort lacked human and economic links with the surrounding area, having a minimum opening to tourists. In the context of a social and ethnic conflict fired at Beliş at the end of 1918 by foreign prisoners of war, Măgura resort was completely destroyed. Another prewar summer colony, placed in the Sebeș Mountains, named Bistra, is also no more existing today. The chalets of Bistra exclusively belonged to the forestry authorities and their closed circuit prevented the development of a true resort. By contrast, the Rest Home Păltiniş (Hohe Rinne) was founded by the Transylvanian Carpathian Association SKV (1894) as an intermediary between the wide public and the mountain world. Păltiniș resort was always open to all nationalities and religions, having a management dedicated to community and not to some privileged. Its development created during the time the beautiful resort that we know today.

Suggested Citation

  • Mircea DRAGOTEANU, 2013. "Eşecul Unui Experiment Administrativ Antebelic Din Munţii Apuseni - Staţiunea Aristocratică Măgura A Trezoreriei Maghiare O Comparaţie Cu Modelele Administrative Ale Staţiunilor Păltiniş Şi Bistra," FIAT IUSTITIA, Dimitrie Cantemir Faculty of Law Cluj Napoca, Romania, vol. 8(2), pages 82-92, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:dcu:journl:v:8:y:2013:i:2:p:82-92
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://fiatiustitia.ro/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/148-Article-Text-277-1-10-20140325.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dcu:journl:v:8:y:2013:i:2:p:82-92. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dimitrie Cantemir Faculty of Law Cluj Napoca, Romania (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://fiatiustitia.ro .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.