IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/dcu/journl/v4y2010i2p91-97.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Possible Interpretations Of Article 6, Law 10/2001 A Case Study

Author

Listed:
  • Codruta Jucan

Abstract

In the context of restitution Law no. 10/2001 a particular situation is discussed: are the goods that existed at the moment of taking over subjected to restitution? Everything in the chemist’s shop represent its inventory and, at the same time, they are the chemist’s shop itself, because their destination is not given by the building in this case, but by the fact that there is the right to practice and necessary equipment to make it a sanitary unity according to legal standards. Consequently, they are movable goods which became immovable through incorporation (as is the shop license to be a chemist’s shop - sanitary unity, given to the person because he possessed the quality of a chemist, and work authorization for the building as such), as well as goods, that is to say utensils and outfit, taken over at the moment of abusive nationalization.

Suggested Citation

  • Codruta Jucan, 2010. "Possible Interpretations Of Article 6, Law 10/2001 A Case Study," FIAT IUSTITIA, Dimitrie Cantemir Faculty of Law Cluj Napoca, Romania, vol. 4(2), pages 91-97, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:dcu:journl:v:4:y:2010:i:2:p:91-97
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://fiatiustitia.ro/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/19-Article-Text-37-1-10-20110614.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dcu:journl:v:4:y:2010:i:2:p:91-97. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dimitrie Cantemir Faculty of Law Cluj Napoca, Romania (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://fiatiustitia.ro .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.