IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/dcu/journl/v4y2010i2p53-58.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Opinion On The Traces Of Gunshots Classification

Author

Listed:
  • Grigore Labo

Abstract

A new classification proposed by the author orders the different categories of gunshots depending on the factors that caused the trace and the distance between the place of firing, and the body that was hit by the projectile. In this way, the traces created only on objects situated close to the mouth of the barrel and due to factors other than the projectile will be considered secondary signs, and those that remain on objects located at an arbitrary distance, but created by the action of the projectile or substances derived from its surface, will be defined as primary traces. It may be noted that the author considers the traces on the objects hit by the projectile regardless of distance from the mouth of fire as primary traces, while the secondary ones will be found only on close situated objects, not always hit by the projectile, so due to other factors which may not occur over a specific distance.

Suggested Citation

  • Grigore Labo, 2010. "An Opinion On The Traces Of Gunshots Classification," FIAT IUSTITIA, Dimitrie Cantemir Faculty of Law Cluj Napoca, Romania, vol. 4(2), pages 53-58, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:dcu:journl:v:4:y:2010:i:2:p:53-58
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://fiatiustitia.ro/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/15-Article-Text-29-1-10-20110614.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    gunshot; traces;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dcu:journl:v:4:y:2010:i:2:p:53-58. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dimitrie Cantemir Faculty of Law Cluj Napoca, Romania (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://fiatiustitia.ro .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.