IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/dcu/journl/v17y2023i1p55-62.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Mountain Area – Trends And Legislative Challenges

Author

Listed:
  • Alexandru CORDOȘ

Abstract

The topic addressed is structured into several sections that include legislative analyses and interpretations regarding the national and international mountain area, economic sociology, history, philosophy, statistics, and anthropology. The analysis extends to the legislative challenges in the direction of sustainable development of the mountain area, the valorization of agricultural production, the development of alternative economic systems, migration, the quality of life, and the workforce. In conclusion, the mountain area is in a paradigm shift, today being considered an area of national importance and it is obvious that we are witnessing a desire for its revival. The aspect is visible through the lens of the recent normative regulations but also of the challenges that include dimensions such as ”generating national security, food sovereignty, depository of cultural values”, and adding economic, ecological, and social values to the mountain space.

Suggested Citation

  • Alexandru CORDOȘ, 2023. "Mountain Area – Trends And Legislative Challenges," FIAT IUSTITIA, Dimitrie Cantemir Faculty of Law Cluj Napoca, Romania, vol. 17(1), pages 55-62, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:dcu:journl:v:17:y:2023:i:1:p:55-62
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://fiatiustitia.ro/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/Fiat-iustitia-nr.-1-an.-2023-08.05.2024-55-62.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    mountain legislation; paradigm; trends; challenges.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • K - Law and Economics

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dcu:journl:v:17:y:2023:i:1:p:55-62. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dimitrie Cantemir Faculty of Law Cluj Napoca, Romania (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://fiatiustitia.ro .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.