IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/dcu/journl/v16y2022i1p96-101.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Aspects About Non-Compliance Over The Procedural Rules Regarding The Making Of Medico-Legal Expertise

Author

Listed:
  • Dan PERJU-DUMBRAVĂ
  • Carmen Corina RADU
  • Alexandru CORDOȘ
  • Michael Ewald SCHÜRGER
  • Andrei-Vlad MATE

Abstract

The medico-legal expertise is evidence in the trial. Failure to comply with the provisions of art. 10 of the "Procedural Norms regarding the performance of expertise, findings and other medico-legal works can lead to the distruction of evidence. Deficiencies were found in the medico-legal approach, regarding the performance of medico-legal expertise and given the increased number of lawyers, it can be assumed that there will be reports of inadvertences in the drafting of medical-legal expertise and consequences.

Suggested Citation

  • Dan PERJU-DUMBRAVĂ & Carmen Corina RADU & Alexandru CORDOȘ & Michael Ewald SCHÜRGER & Andrei-Vlad MATE, 2022. "Aspects About Non-Compliance Over The Procedural Rules Regarding The Making Of Medico-Legal Expertise," FIAT IUSTITIA, Dimitrie Cantemir Faculty of Law Cluj Napoca, Romania, vol. 16(1), pages 70-76, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:dcu:journl:v:16:y:2022:i:1:p:96-101
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://fiatiustitia.ro/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/Fiat-Iustitia-nr.-1-2022-06.03.2023-96-101.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    criminal law; forensics;

    JEL classification:

    • K14 - Law and Economics - - Basic Areas of Law - - - Criminal Law
    • K4 - Law and Economics - - Legal Procedure, the Legal System, and Illegal Behavior

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dcu:journl:v:16:y:2022:i:1:p:96-101. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dimitrie Cantemir Faculty of Law Cluj Napoca, Romania (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://fiatiustitia.ro .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.