IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/dcu/journl/v15y2021i2p93-105.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Correlation Of The Legislative Situation Regarding The Forensic Expertise Carried Out By The Expert Recommended By The Parties

Author

Listed:
  • Dan PERJU-DUMBRAVĂ
  • Rodica-Diana APAN
  • Codrin REBELEANU
  • Corina-Carmen RADU

Abstract

A new institution, that of the forensic expert recommended by the parties, has been regulated in the field of forensic medicine. Corroborating the new regulation with the existing ones in the field, it is found that the guarantee of procedural rights, conferred by the right of the party to recommend a forensic expert, is not fully effective, on the considerations analyzed extensively in the present study.

Suggested Citation

  • Dan PERJU-DUMBRAVĂ & Rodica-Diana APAN & Codrin REBELEANU & Corina-Carmen RADU, 2021. "Correlation Of The Legislative Situation Regarding The Forensic Expertise Carried Out By The Expert Recommended By The Parties," FIAT IUSTITIA, Dimitrie Cantemir Faculty of Law Cluj Napoca, Romania, vol. 15(2), pages 93-105, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:dcu:journl:v:15:y:2021:i:2:p:93-105
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://fiatiustitia.ro/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/FIAT-IUSTITIA-nr.-2-din-2021-10.06.2022-93-105.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    forensic medicine; forensic doctor; forensic expert; expert report; expert opinion;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • I18 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Government Policy; Regulation; Public Health

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dcu:journl:v:15:y:2021:i:2:p:93-105. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dimitrie Cantemir Faculty of Law Cluj Napoca, Romania (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://fiatiustitia.ro .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.