IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/dcu/journl/v15y2021i2p47-61.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Independence Of The Judiciary Through A Philosophical Perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Alexandru CORDOȘ
  • Diandra-Ioana TANASĂ-COZDREANU

Abstract

This paper analyzes the importance of the principle of independence of the judiciary in a rule of law, but also the separation of powers, these two principles leading to an independent and efficient justice. This study is based on a philosophical approach and perspective of the justice independence and separation of powers, but also how this principles are applied in Romania, considering accession at the European Union. The philosophical perspective has determined the detailed understanding of these two principles, thus observing their application during the existence of fortress-states, and now, when they are represented by national parties and institutions. Justice is one of the most important thing of consolidated democracy, and that is why it is important to see the trajectory of the theory and how is applied today, given the constitutional mechanisms.

Suggested Citation

  • Alexandru CORDOȘ & Diandra-Ioana TANASĂ-COZDREANU, 2021. "Independence Of The Judiciary Through A Philosophical Perspective," FIAT IUSTITIA, Dimitrie Cantemir Faculty of Law Cluj Napoca, Romania, vol. 15(2), pages 47-61, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:dcu:journl:v:15:y:2021:i:2:p:47-61
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://fiatiustitia.ro/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/FIAT-IUSTITIA-nr.-2-din-2021-10.06.2022-47-61.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    philosophy; law; rule of law; EU; separation of powers; state;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • K10 - Law and Economics - - Basic Areas of Law - - - General (Constitutional Law)
    • K16 - Law and Economics - - Basic Areas of Law - - - Election Law

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dcu:journl:v:15:y:2021:i:2:p:47-61. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dimitrie Cantemir Faculty of Law Cluj Napoca, Romania (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://fiatiustitia.ro .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.