IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/dcu/journl/v14y2020i2p20-29.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

THE DYNAMICS OF THE PARLIAMENTARY STRUCTURES AND MECHANISMS OF SCRUTINY APPLICABLE TO THE EXECUTION OF THE ECtHR JUDGMENTS AGAINST ROMANIA

Author

Listed:
  • Alina Mihaela GRIGORESCU

Abstract

All levels of state power (the executive, legislature and judiciary) are required to ensure respect for human rights. National parliaments are the key to the effective implementation of international human rights norms and standards at national level and they are in an excellent position to protect human rights through legislating, being involved in the ratification of international human rights treaties. Also, national parliaments are strategically placed to hold the governments to account for swift and effective implementation of the Court’s judgments, as well as to swiftly adopt the necessary legislative amendments. This draft examines a small piece of the role of national parliaments - through the specific structures - within domestic systems for the implementation of European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) standards and European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR or ‘the Court’) judgments.

Suggested Citation

  • Alina Mihaela GRIGORESCU, 2020. "THE DYNAMICS OF THE PARLIAMENTARY STRUCTURES AND MECHANISMS OF SCRUTINY APPLICABLE TO THE EXECUTION OF THE ECtHR JUDGMENTS AGAINST ROMANIA," FIAT IUSTITIA, Dimitrie Cantemir Faculty of Law Cluj Napoca, Romania, vol. 14(2), pages 20-29, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:dcu:journl:v:14:y:2020:i:2:p:20-29
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://fiatiustitia.ro/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/Fiat-nr.-2_2020-1-20-29.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    respect for human rights; national parliaments; implementation of European Convention on Human Rights (ECtHR) standards; parliamentary scrutiny; execution of judgments of the European Court;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • K38 - Law and Economics - - Other Substantive Areas of Law - - - Human Rights Law; Gender Law; Animal Rights Law

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dcu:journl:v:14:y:2020:i:2:p:20-29. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dimitrie Cantemir Faculty of Law Cluj Napoca, Romania (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://fiatiustitia.ro .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.