IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/dcu/journl/v14y2020i1p98-107.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Particularities Of The Assessment Of The Damage Caused By The Practice Of The Illegal Hunt

Author

Listed:
  • Tetyana Kurilo
  • Eugenia Gugulan

Abstract

Hunting being understood as the final act of business coerced sustainable management of wildlife hunting took place in the last century and will be carried out further in a balanced legal framework regulated by written rules and unwritten rules of behavior hunter responsible and civilized. A key issue in exercising their right to compensation for damage caused by the animal kingdom is the illegal hunting activities that damage assessment amount representing extent of the damages to be awarded. Besides the complexity of assessing the environmental damages caused to any category of resources, the specific injury caused to fauna species of hunting is the impossibility of restoring nature destroyed components which make it necessary for the assessment and consideration of other parameters, costs for rebuilding hunting. As a consequence, the author made a thorough study on the characteristics and problems related to the assessment of damages caused by illegal hunting practice.

Suggested Citation

  • Tetyana Kurilo & Eugenia Gugulan, 2020. "The Particularities Of The Assessment Of The Damage Caused By The Practice Of The Illegal Hunt," FIAT IUSTITIA, Dimitrie Cantemir Faculty of Law Cluj Napoca, Romania, vol. 14(1), pages 98-107, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:dcu:journl:v:14:y:2020:i:1:p:98-107
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://fiatiustitia.ro/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/Fiat_1_2020_103-113.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    evaluation; environmental damage; wildlife hunting; illegal hunting;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • K32 - Law and Economics - - Other Substantive Areas of Law - - - Energy, Environmental, Health, and Safety Law

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dcu:journl:v:14:y:2020:i:1:p:98-107. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dimitrie Cantemir Faculty of Law Cluj Napoca, Romania (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://fiatiustitia.ro .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.