IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/dcu/journl/v14y2020i1p5-21.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Constitutional Protection Of Freedom Of Expression In The Context Of Information Technology

Author

Listed:
  • Marius Andreescu
  • Andra Puran

Abstract

Few legal, philosophical, or theological categories have given rise to such a great interest as the issue of human freedom. It is natural to be so because freedom is not only a concept, but rather an ontological dimension of man viewed as a person but also in the social environment. Freedom of expression is an important form of human freedom, which is transposed into a legal form and becomes a fundamental constitutional right. In this study we analyze the main doctrinal and jurisprudence aspects of freedom of expression. As a novelty aspect to other similar studies, the correlations between the legal form and some theological and philosophical interpretations of freedom of expression are analyzed. In the context of the development of information technology in the field of communication, important aspects of constitutional jurisprudence regarding the protection of freedom of expression are analyzed, especially in the situation where the exercise of this fundamental right could be conditioned or restricted.

Suggested Citation

  • Marius Andreescu & Andra Puran, 2020. "Constitutional Protection Of Freedom Of Expression In The Context Of Information Technology," FIAT IUSTITIA, Dimitrie Cantemir Faculty of Law Cluj Napoca, Romania, vol. 14(1), pages 5-21, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:dcu:journl:v:14:y:2020:i:1:p:5-21
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://fiatiustitia.ro/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/Fiat_1_2020_5-22.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    significances of human freedom; freedom of expression as a fundamental right; theological and philosophical reflections on freedom of expression; aspects of jurisprudence regarding the protection of freedom of expression;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • K38 - Law and Economics - - Other Substantive Areas of Law - - - Human Rights Law; Gender Law; Animal Rights Law

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dcu:journl:v:14:y:2020:i:1:p:5-21. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dimitrie Cantemir Faculty of Law Cluj Napoca, Romania (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://fiatiustitia.ro .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.