IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/dcu/journl/v12y2018i1p53-67.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Retrospective Of Incrimination Of The Offense Of Illegal Abortion In The Republic Of Moldova

Author

Listed:
  • Alexandru Cicala

Abstract

In this article we will submit to a research the evolution of abortion liberalization as a tool for the protection of human rights and the evolution of the criminalization of the offence of illegal abortion in the Republic of Moldova. The History is perhaps the only one way we have at our fingertips to truly verify the course of the crime and the criminalization of the offense of illegal abortion in the Republic of Moldova. Immoral, from the point of view of the church, illegitimate by the laws of some states, the right of abortion had a sinuous evolution, permanently controversial throughout history. Regarding the history of the concepts of abortion, we think it's extremely important. So, we think it's essential to look at how people have seen abortion over time. In addition, throughout history, as we will see, abstaining abnormal attitudes have been adopted from the legislative point of view.

Suggested Citation

  • Alexandru Cicala, 2018. "The Retrospective Of Incrimination Of The Offense Of Illegal Abortion In The Republic Of Moldova," FIAT IUSTITIA, Dimitrie Cantemir Faculty of Law Cluj Napoca, Romania, vol. 12(1), pages 53-67, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:dcu:journl:v:12:y:2018:i:1:p:53-67
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://fiatiustitia.ro/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/344-Article-Text-668-1-10-20180517.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    crime; the offence of illegal abortion; historical evolution; reproductive health; pregnancy; miscarriage; indicment of abortion; legalization of abortion;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • K14 - Law and Economics - - Basic Areas of Law - - - Criminal Law

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dcu:journl:v:12:y:2018:i:1:p:53-67. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dimitrie Cantemir Faculty of Law Cluj Napoca, Romania (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://fiatiustitia.ro .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.