IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/dcu/journl/v12y2018i1p207-223.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Primary Regime – A Family Protection Guarantee Ways To Balance The Powers Of The Spouses

Author

Listed:
  • Carmen-Oana Mihaila

Abstract

Over the last years, the liberalization of matrimonial conventions has been one of the greatest achievements in civil legislation. Although the number of concluded matrimonial conventions is not very large, a major leap forward has been taken. Irrespective of the matrimonial regime mentioned by the spouses within a convention, or the possibility of the spouses to choose from a wider or smaller variety of regimes, there is a always a set of mandatory rules applicable for all these situations. These rules, referred to as the primary imperative regime, are a real „constitution” (as named by the French doctrine) of the matrimonial regimes, intended to protect the family. The provisions of the primary regime, which produce mandatory and immediate effects upon conclusion of marriage, are applicable for a normal and harmonious cohabitation of the couple but also at times of conjugal crisis. The family home, the spouses` economic and social independence, and the various mechanisms to control the spouses` powers are only a few elements of the primary regime that are approached within the present paper. The conventional and judicial mandates are considered real instruments to manage the patrimonial relations between the spouses. In addition, the paper provides a comparative analysis of similar provisions from the French and Belgian laws.

Suggested Citation

  • Carmen-Oana Mihaila, 2018. "The Primary Regime – A Family Protection Guarantee Ways To Balance The Powers Of The Spouses," FIAT IUSTITIA, Dimitrie Cantemir Faculty of Law Cluj Napoca, Romania, vol. 12(1), pages 207-223, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:dcu:journl:v:12:y:2018:i:1:p:207-223
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://fiatiustitia.ro/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/358-Article-Text-696-1-10-20180517.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    primary regime; family home; marriage expenses; conventional mandate; judicial authorization; limitation of the spouses` powers Pages: 207-223;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • K35 - Law and Economics - - Other Substantive Areas of Law - - - Personal Bankruptcy Law
    • K11 - Law and Economics - - Basic Areas of Law - - - Property Law

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dcu:journl:v:12:y:2018:i:1:p:207-223. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dimitrie Cantemir Faculty of Law Cluj Napoca, Romania (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://fiatiustitia.ro .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.