IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/dcu/journl/v12y2018i1p108-113.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Difficulty Of Implementation Of Work Sanction In The Community

Author

Listed:
  • Catalina-Georgeta Dinu

Abstract

If determined persons are constantly and repeatedly disturbing public peace, the injured can appeal to the police and the local public administration authority to which they belong to signal the disagreeable issues. Such acts must lead to the punishment of those concerned in accordance with the provisions of Article 2, paragraph 26 of Law no. 61/1991. However, the legal measures taken are often ineffective and do not constitute a "threat" for the offenders, and they continue unhindered to disturb public peace. In this study, we shall report these irregularities and try to find legal remedies in order to address legal shortcomings in the field and to ensure good governance by the competent institutions to take action.

Suggested Citation

  • Catalina-Georgeta Dinu, 2018. "Difficulty Of Implementation Of Work Sanction In The Community," FIAT IUSTITIA, Dimitrie Cantemir Faculty of Law Cluj Napoca, Romania, vol. 12(1), pages 108-113, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:dcu:journl:v:12:y:2018:i:1:p:108-113
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://fiatiustitia.ro/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/349-Article-Text-678-1-10-20180517.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    contravention; fine; community work; public authority;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • K39 - Law and Economics - - Other Substantive Areas of Law - - - Other

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dcu:journl:v:12:y:2018:i:1:p:108-113. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dimitrie Cantemir Faculty of Law Cluj Napoca, Romania (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://fiatiustitia.ro .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.